Power Rankings Around the Net
Alright. I know we're all still talking about the Chris Chambers trade, and be sure to carry on that conversation in the 2 posts below this one, but I still wanted to take a look at the power rankings. Can the Dolphins make it a clean sweep at the #32 spot? We shall find out.
-ESPN: 32
I wouldn't say 17 points seems low. The Dolphins have played the Pats tough in Miami in recent years, even during their 4-12 season when the Dolphins pulled out a miracle on a Monday nighter in Miami. I think 17 seems pretty fair to me.
-CBS Sports: 32
Oh it's possible, though I wouldn't bet on it.
-FOX Sports: 32
Are you f*ckin kidding me? Why would this guy even mention Brohm and Woodson? It's amazing how ignorant some members of the national media can be in regards to some teams and their particular situations. I guess they never got the memo about John Beck. They'll get to know him soon enough, though.
-Yahoo! Sports: 31 (Jason Cole) & 31 (Charles Robinson)
Robinson: Someone ask Joey Porter if his $20 million in guaranteed money will be worth spending his last few years in an NFL cesspool. Forget sending the Dolphins overseas in two weeks and send someone to Germany to fish the Hamburg Sea Devils out of the local bar. I guarantee the game would be better.
Alright...I'll address the latter comment first. Calling the Dolphins the "cesspool" of the NFL is a bit rough if you ask me. Sure, they aren't any good right now. But c'mon. Detroit in the late 90s and early 2000s was a cesspool. And saying that the Hamburg Sea Devils could make the London game a better game is really just stupid. Here's my take on that game: I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Dolphins won that game. They're very popular in London and it might do them some good to get away from the angry south Florida fans and feel the embrace of the English fans. And the reality is that the Giants really aren't that good. They don't scare me at all, really. I think the potential is there for the offense to have a big day and what better of a situation than in London for this once proud defense to step up and play a bigtime game.
As for Cole, I really never even thought that Zach would think about retirement despite the fact that this team is struggling like it is. But he could be on to something. Could this year be all for Thomas? I wouldn't bank on it, as his desire and love of the game is clearly still there. And he's just as good as he's ever been, or at least close to it. But I guess anything is possible.
-The Sporting News: 32
Thanks for stating the obvious. I can see why he makes the big bucks.
-Covers.com: 30
Lovely analogy right there. I'll move on.
-Football Locks: 31
Yup.
-NFL Report: 32
3 touchdowns? Really? Are you sure? If you're going to knock this team, at least get the stats right.
Average Rank: 31
Surprising that this team actually was ranked as high as 30th. I guess there are people out there besides me who think this team isn't as bad as its record indicates. You call these people "idiots," myself included.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
Ranking...
As for the Giants, if you say they aren't any good, despite being 4-2, despite having beaten teams that Miami couldn't beat...then what does that say about 0-for-the-season, Miami?
If Derek Anderson throw 3 TD's and looks like Tom Brady against us, how many yards will Eli Manning have?
I think at 0-6 we might wait till we actually beat someone before we say this or that team sucks.
by Natalya on
Oct 17, 2007 1:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Natalya..
We are 0-6, but that could be 3-3 or better if only for the dumb mistakes. Forget about the D. If we cut mental mistake from the special teams and the O we will win a game during this season, and with Beck we will win at leats 2. Without CChambers, the Lemon without limonade, will acknowledge that there are more receiver. Last game he only saw CChamber, one past to Ginn and a couple to Booker, but most of the time was to CChambers. GO DOLPHINS!!
Be patien and you know, better than most, that we are better than what our record stated, the good thing is that we are going to pick first next year. So let be proud of been dead last on the chart. SOON we will be a real dinasty from the new era of salary cap. A lot of young guns and all.
by Aleta on
Oct 17, 2007 2:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Aleta...
Yeah I agree, lets laugh about being #32 in the chart, I mean you have to have a sense of humor right?
Remember one of the big reasons bad teams keep losing is they make mistakes and can't close out games. More or less what we've done all year.
I agree we will definitely beat someone, no way we go 0-16. I just don't think it will be NE that we beat. THough the jets and bills I can definitely see us winning those games.
by Natalya on
Oct 17, 2007 3:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs










