What Makes a Winner? 2013 Edition



We’ve reached the lull between free agency and the 2014 NFL Draft. Not much will be happening in the next couple weeks; the big fish have all been reeled in and free agency is winding down. I'm going to break from discussing draft prospects and take a closer look at what makes a winning team in today’s NFL.

If you've ever met me in the comments section of a FanPost, you know that I love statistics. The problem I've found with statistics is that they don’t always tell the truth. Numbers can mislead if they aren't put in the proper context and professional football is a complex team sport… where every player on each side of the ball has a specific assignment on each play and his teammates depend on him to execute. Football can’t be described completely by statistics, but in this article I will try to "define" the elements of a winning football team in the 2013 NFL… What do winning teams have in common? What are the factors that really make a difference? Can power-football still win today’s ‘pass-happy' NFL? Should some positions be viewed as 'more valuable' than others?

Here's How I Went About It

I used as my source for all of the statistics. I started by plugging all of the 2013 statistics by team totals into a spreadsheet (Wins, Points, Turnovers, QB Rating, etc…). I then used a statistical software to calculate the Correlation Coefficent, which I’ll refer to as CC from here on.

Correlation in a Nutshell

Correlation is basically the relationship between two variables. Think of driving... you step on the gas and you're RPMs go up and so does your MPH. These two variables have a relationship that if one increases the other also increases (if you're driving on a nice flat highway with no wind).

It's easier to sum it up in graph. Here are some good examples:





Positive Correlation: The CC (correlation coefficient) gives a measure between +1 and -1 of how strongly one statistic is correlated to the other. A CC of 1.0 means 100% positive correlation, so there is a direct relationship between these two statistics and as one gets larger the other also gets larger. For examples, Pass Completions and Passing Yards have a very strong correlation of .88.

Negative Correlation: A CC of -1.0 means that there is a 100% negative correlation, so as one statistic goes up the other goes down. For example, Int's and QB Rating have a strong negative correlation of -.75, so as Int's increase the QB Rating tends to decrease.

No Correlation: A CC of 0 means that no correlation can be found between the two statistics. So whether one statistics goes up or down has no effect on the other statistic. An example of this is Total Plays and Yards/Completion… they have a CC of -.01, meaning they have no detectable relationship.

After the statistical software calculated all of the CC’s, I plugged this into another spreadsheet and sorted them by their correlation to Total Wins. This is the basis of my article. I’ll lay out and discuss which statistical categories tend to have the most correlation with Winning. I’ll also touch out a few surprises and areas of interest.

Disclaimer!! Correlation does not imply Causation?!

I understand that correlation does not imply causation. Just because two statistics tend to increase together does not mean that one causes the other. But I think that it is equally important to point out that when there is causation, there is a likely correlation. Looking for distinct and repetitive trends in the data will help us identify the difference.

Let’s Begin Now.

First, here is a summary that shows all of the statistics with a CC greater than +.5 or less than -.5.

Rank Statistical Category CC
1 DEF Total Pts Against -0.75
2 OFF Score% +.73
3 OFF Total Points +.71
4 OFF Points/Drive +.7
5 OFF Pass TD % +.67
6 OFF Adjusted Yards/Pass +.67
7 DEF Pass TD% Against -0.67
8 OFF QB Rating +.65
9 OFF Start Field Position +.65
10 TEAM Turnover Margin +.65
11 DEF QB Rating Against -0.63
12 DEF Adj. Net Yds/Pass -0.57
13 OFF Turnover % -0.56
14 OFF Int's Thrown -0.56
15 DEF Int +.51
16 DEF Turnovers +.51
17 DEF Sack Yards +.51

Many of these statistics are similar. For example, OFF Score% is nearly identical to OFF Total Points and OFF Points/Drive. To simplify the analysis, I removed these duplicates (shown with a strikethrough)

That brought the list down to the Final 7.

Rank Statistical Category CC
1 DEF Total Pts Against -0.75
2 OFF Score% +.73
3 OFF Pass TD % +.67
4 DEF Pass TD% Against -0.67
5 OFF Starting Field Position +.65
6 TEAM Turnover Margin +.65
7 DEF Sack Yards +.51

1. Defensive Points Allowed: CC = -.75

Top 5: Def Points Allowed Wins
1 Seattle Seahawks 231 13
2 Carolina Panthers 241 12
3 San Francisco 49ers 272 12
4 New Orleans Saints 304 11
5 Cincinnati Bengals 305 11
Bottom 5: Def Pts Allowed Wins
28 Jacksonville Jaguars 449 4
29 Oakland Raiders 453 4
30 Chicago Bears 478 8
31 Washington Redskins 478 3
32 Minnesota Vikings 480 5.5
Miami's Rank
8 Miami Dolphins 335 8

This is the team statistic with the highest correlation to Winning, and it is obviously a negative correlation. The more points your defense gives up the fewer games you win.

Chicago is a bit of an anomaly on this list with 8 wins, but that is mainly because they had a fairly high-powered offense in 2013 ranking 2nd in the NFL in offensive points scored.

2. Offensive Scoring Percentage: CC = +.73

(percentage of drives ending in an offensive score)

Top 5: Scoring % Wins
1 Denver Broncos 47.5% 13
2 San Diego Chargers 44.9% 9
3 Green Bay Packers 40.9% 8.5
4 New England Patriots 40.8% 12
5 Seattle Seahawks 40.7% 13
Bottom 5: Scoring % Wins
28 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 27.1% 4
29 Cleveland Browns 26.2% 4
30 Houston Texans 25.9% 2
31 New York Giants 25.5% 7
32 Jacksonville Jaguars 23.6% 4
Miami's Rank
23 Miami Dolphins 29.9% 8

This is basically the opposite of the last category. As much as great defenses are related to winning, great offenses have almost equal impact. There were several other categories that were very similar to this that had similar correlation: Total Points (CC= .71) and Points/Drive (CC= .70). Essentially, we are talking about offensive efficiency. Not surprisingly, winning teams score on a higher percentage of their drives than losing teams.

Interestingly Jacksonville was ranked in the bottom 5 of both statistics so far. Ouch. They have a long way to go to become competitive… Notice Miami has not been at the top or bottom of either of these categories.

3. Offensive Pass TD %: CC = .67

(Pass TD’s / Pass Attempts)

Top 5: Passing TD % Wins
1 Denver Broncos 8.1% 13
2 Seattle Seahawks 6.4% 13
3 Philadelphia Eagles 6.3% 10
4 New Orleans Saints 6.0% 11
5 San Diego Chargers 5.9% 9
Bottom 5: Passing TD % Wins
28 Baltimore Ravens 3.1% 8
29 Buffalo Bills 3.1% 6
30 Houston Texans 3.0% 2
31 New York Jets 2.7% 8
32 Jacksonville Jaguars 2.7% 4
Miami's Rank
21 Miami Dolphins 4.0% 8

This category deals with passing efficiency. Teams that can move the ball and score efficiently through the air tend to win more games. Offensive Pass TD % was the most highly correlated of several passing statistics. Others that I won’t discuss in detail due to the similarity include QB Rating, Int’s and Yards/Pass.

Again there are some anomalies on this list. Both Baltimore & NYJ had very poor Pass TD % but came out of 2013 with 8 wins. Here are possible explanations: The Jets had a solid defense and a commitment to the run. This kept them in games and made up for their lack of firepower. The Ravens were barely in the top half of the league on defense and were in the bottom half of the league in both Passing TD’s and Rushing TD’s. Their saving grace was Justin Tucker who led the NFL in Field Goals Made.

4. Defensive Pass TD % Against: CC = -.67

(Defensive Pass TD’s Allowed/Attempts)

Top 5: Defensive Pass TD % Wins
1 Tennessee Titans 2.8% 7
2 Miami Dolphins 2.9% 8
3 Carolina Panthers 3.0% 12
4 Seattle Seahawks 3.1% 13
5 San Francisco 49ers 3.2% 12
Bottom 5: Def Pass TD % Wins
28 Green Bay Packers 5.6% 8.5
29 Minnesota Vikings 5.7% 5.5
30 Atlanta Falcons 6.0% 4
31 Oakland Raiders 6.0% 4
32 Houston Texans 6.0% 2
Miami's Rank
18 Miami Dolphins 2.9% 8

A trend seems to be developing. Pass efficiency seems to have a very strong correlation with winning… whether it be a team’s passing attack on offense or their ability to stop the pass on defense. Both are equally correlated with winning.

Miami’s first appearance on a list indicates that the strength of their defense (and really, the entire team) was the ability to lock-down the airways to the end zone. Tennessee and Miami are both a little out of place here with 7 & 8 wins, but keep in mind both were in the bottom half of the league in offensive scoring. We’re beginning to see that a strong defense can offset a poor offense and vice-versa... enough to make you a play-off contender.

5. Starting Field Position: CC = +.65

Top 5: Starting Field Position Wins
1 Kansas City Chiefs 33.6 11
2 San Francisco 49ers 31.9 12
3 Seattle Seahawks 31.0 13
4 New England Patriots 30.2 12
5 Pittsburgh Steelers 29.8 8
Btm 5: Starting Field Position Wins
28 Atlanta Falcons 26.5 4
29 St. Louis Rams 26.3 7
30 Houston Texans 26.3 2
31 New York Jets 26.0 8
32 Washington Redskins 25.3 3
Miami's Rank
16 Miami Dolphins 27.9 8

6. Team Turnover Margin: CC = +.65

Top 5: Turnover Margin Wins
1 Seattle Seahawks 20 13
2 Kansas City Chiefs 18 11
3 Indianapolis Colts 13 11
4 Philadelphia Eagles 12 10
5 San Francisco 49ers 12 12
Btm 5: Turnover Margin Wins
28 Detroit Lions -12 7
29 Minnesota Vikings -12 5.5
30 New York Jets -14 8
31 New York Giants -15 7
32 Houston Texans -20 2
Miami's Rank
18 Miami Dolphins -2 8

Both Field Position and Turnover Margin are true team statistics and are an indicator of a team’s offensive and defensive effectiveness. We always hear that the turnover differential is a key to winning, and this supports it. Another old football cliché is to say that it is a game of field position… which is also true. This isn’t ground –breaking but it does support good ol’ fashioned football logic. Hang on to the football and move the ball downfield.

7. Defensive Sack Yards: CC = +.51

Top 5: Sack Yards Wins
1 Carolina Panthers 424 12
2 Buffalo Bills 395 6
3 Arizona Cardinals 337 10
4 New Orleans Saints 336 11
5 St. Louis Rams 326 7
Btm 5: Sack Yards Wins
28 New York Giants 214 7
29 Pittsburgh Steelers 205 8
30 Chicago Bears 189 8
31 Houston Texans 187 2
32 Cleveland Browns 185 4
Miami's Rank
13 Miami Dolphins 272 8

The Panthers and the Bills really dominated that category? They are way ahead of the Cardinals and the rest of the NFL.

This category supports the importance of line play, both offensive and defensive. It isn't as highly correlated as the other categories we've looked at, but it still suggests that protecting the quarterback is nearly as important as the ability of the quarterback. It’s interesting to note that Sack Yards showed a higher correlation to Winning than Total Sacks or even Sack %.

Surprises and Points of Interest


via (Jamaal Charles, the active Career YPC leader.)

How much does the running game matter anymore?

Very few rushing statistics (offense or defense) have a significant correlation with winning. On offense the strongest was Rushing Attempts (.42). Shockingly, Yards/Rush (.07) had almost ZERO correlation with winning. On defense, again we see that Rushing Attempts Against (-.47) had the strongest negative correlation with winning (meaning that the more opponents run the ball against you, the more likely you are to lose). And again Yards/Rush Allowed (-.01) had almost no effect on how often teams won.


via (Aaron Rodger, the NFL's All-Time QB Rating Leader)

A passing efficiency league?

While almost all of the Offensive and Defensive passing efficiency statistics have a very strong correlation with winning… Defensive Pass Yards/Game had almost no impact on winning. The likely explanation is that when a team is behind they are more likely to throw the ball, which results in more pass yards but not necessarily better efficiency. Passing volume nearly as important as Passing Efficiency. Teams must be able to Pass and stop the Pass to win consistently... the running game has become secondary.

On a somewhat related note…There were just over twice as many Passing 1st Downs (6210) in the NFL as Rushing 1st Downs (3059). Simply put, most NFL teams move the chains by throwing the ball.


  • I typed "Seattle" a lot in this article. The Seahawks were dominant in nearly every statistical category that mattered. Wow.
  • Pass Offense & Defense were the keys to winning in the 2013 NFL. Specifically passing efficiency. It appears that teams pass the ball to get first downs, field position and points.
  • The running game has become less critical to winning. Yards/Carry shows almost no effect on winning… As I stated above, Total Rushing Attempts (for or against) has the most significant impact on winning of all the rushing statistics. The conclusion I draw from this is simple, teams run the ball more when they have a lead. And it is starting to become clear that leads are built through an efficient passing game. Think about the 2008 Dolphins: efficient passer (Pennington), great turnover differential and solid pass defense. That is still a winning formula.
  • Looking at what winning teams have in common begins to show us trends about how to build winning football teams. Some people refer to this as "positional value"… the idea that some positions are more valuable to the football team than others. These are the positions that finding an All-Pro can make the most direct impact on a football team’s ability to win.
    1. Obviously Quarterback is the keystone position.
    2. Below quarterbacks, we will find positions that directly affect the passing game: Pass Rushers (LB/DE/DT), Pass Catchers (WR/TE), Pass Defenders (CB/S) and Pass Blockers (OL).
    3. The third tier are the positions that are oriented towards running the football: Runners (RB) & Run Stuffers (Nose Tackles, Two-Down LB, In-the-box Safety).
    4. Not far behind are the Kicker and Punter, since they can have a direct affect on Scoring % and Starting Field Position. The argument could be made that kickers and punters have already become more important than running backs. This will become even more apparent if the Extra Point is moved out to 30 or 40+ yards.

  • The 2013 Miami Dolphins were an 8-8 team. Miami’s ranking in key statistics helps explain why.
    • Strengths: Pass Defense and Points Allowed
    • Weaknesses: Offensive Scoring and Passing Efficiency
    • Miami’s inability to score points consistently allowed their opponents to run the ball against them. Alot. Miami had the 2nd most rushing attempts against them in the entire league. Since Miami didn’t score many points teams were able to run the ball pretty much whenever they wanted. Either they were running to maintain a lead or they were running because it was a close game and Miami doesn’t have a high-powered offense that would allow them to pull away. Running the ball shortens games, which probably contributed to Miami’s defense not giving up many points. Miami’s biggest hurdle to making the leap into the playoffs appears to be improving their Offensive Passing Efficiency. So let’s hope we draft a WR, TE before a RB this year. Can anyone remember the last time that happened? (Patrick Turner & Brian Hartline in 2009)

via (Jeff Ireland, former Miami Dolphins GM)

Finally, if you made it this far…

A Sincere Thank You! I really enjoyed doing this and I feel like I came away with a better understanding of what REALLY makes a winner. I hope you learned something too, or found a new perspective, or confirmed your suspicions. Either way, I’d like to hear everyone’s thoughts and criticisms of this article. Could I have presented information more clearly? Charts? Graphs? Additional Info? Any follow up questions?

Please let me know and I will make updates to this post to improve it’s clarity. Again, Thank You for taking the time to read and hopefully you got something out of it. Please REC if you did. I’d like to write more of these and if anyone else enjoys reading them. I’d also appreciate any suggestions from my fellow Phinsiders on other areas you would like to take a look inside the numbers.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of The Phinsider's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of The Phinsider writers or editors.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join The Phinsider

You must be a member of The Phinsider to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Phinsider. You should read them.

Join The Phinsider

You must be a member of The Phinsider to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Phinsider. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.