Free Agent Candidates for the Miami Dolphins: Offensive Guards
It's time to get into the nitty gritty positions with free agency. We're beyond the flashiness of QBs, WRs, and TEs. The next few weeks will be focused along the offensive and defensive lines. First up are guard candidates. Most people know the top candidates, but they're a bit pricey. Let's get to all of them.
Carl Nicks: He will probably command the most money of any guard in free agency. His teammate, Jahri Evans, signed a 7-year deal for over $56 million just last year. Look for Nicks to get a deal close to that number. Such a deal would average just over $8 million per season.
Ben Grubbs: If Nicks was considered the number 1 option at guard, consider Grubbs to be number 1A. Being that Grubbs is almost as equally talented as Nicks, expect a contract that is almost equal as well. Quality can be expensive.
Jake Scott: An option I've touted for awhile now. He's solid, but not elite. He is a very good pass protector, but has always been just average at run blocking. In the past 3 years, he has surrendered only 3 sacks. He's also a tough and durable player. He even finished as the seventh ranked guard in the NFL in 2011. For comparison, Grubbs ranked 12th. Scott would be a solid option and could be had for approximately $4-6 mil per year. While Nicks and Grubbs would offer more, you could get Scott plus another free agent for the price of one elite guard.
Evan Mathis: An under-the-radar player by fans maybe, but the Eagles will be looking to keep him in the city by any means necessary. Mathis was dominant in the run game this year and easily ranked as the top run-blocking guard in 2011. Not only that, but he didn't allow a single sack the entire year, which is impressive when you have a QB like Michael Vick that will hold on to the ball for long periods of time. Overall, Mathis beat out Nicks pretty easily as the top ranked guard in 2011 based on Pro Football Focus. He may not reach the contract amount of Nicks or Grubbs, but he should get around $5-7 million per season. Unlike Scott, Mathis is a natural LG as well so for those looking for a way to move Richie Incognito to RG, Mathis could be the best way to do it.
Bobbie Williams: He's been consistently one of the best guards in the NFL, but he is coming off an injury plagued season that limited him to 9 games. Still, he only allowed a single sack and ranked better than any of Miami's guards. The big downfall? He'll be 36 in September.
Vernon Carey: Our own option if we wish to resign him. Carey played average this year, but continued to have problems with his legs. For those that think Carey played solid or very well, I'd have to disagree and say just average. He only allowed 3 sacks, which is average for a guard, but also allowed 7 QB hits, which is below average. While all the guards mentioned above were ranked in the top 25 guards (Williams at 23), Carey finished as the 44th ranked guard. Still, the big reason for moving ahead without him is that he just can't stay healthy.
Other notable options: John Greco, Derrick Dockery, Russ Hochstein, Leonard Davis, Dan Connolly, Stacy Andrews, Deuce Lutui, and Will Montgomery.
Another option would be if Miami wished to sign a free agent center like Scott Wells from Green Bay or others like Matt Birk, Andre Gurode, Jeff Saturday, or Todd McClure and then move Mike Pouncey to guard. While that is an option, I consider it unlikely. When you have a solid center in place, the last thing you want to do is move them to another position. Center is just more valuable and all the players I mentioned above with the exception of Wells are in their final years.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I said it in my mock draft, and I’ll say it again. Sign Grubbs. If we were to sign only Peyton Manning and Ben Grubbs, I’d be very pleased.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." George Carlin
So would Manning and Grubbs...
And the $20 million or so it’d cost to get both players. With Miami at about $15 mil in space, they’d have to dump about $10 mil in salary to get Manning, Grubbs, and then sign their draft picks. That’d be all the moves Miami could make.
- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.
Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider.
Follow me on Twitter @Finhead83.
Again, as said above. It’s doable. Restructure a few contracts (Long, Bell, for starters), and BAM!
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." George Carlin
by DolphinNation on Feb 14, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't move Pouncey to guard
Would be a negative thing on his development.
by LimeyPhin on Feb 10, 2012 5:19 PM EST via mobile reply actions
The only way I would move Pouncey
is if we got Manning and signed Jeff Saturday. I would be hesitant to make that move but Saturday could make an excellent tudor/mentor for Pouncey.
by kermit the frogger29 on Feb 10, 2012 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
Nicks would be may 1st choice
He’s the youngest at 26 and most durable. He’s dominate against both the run and pass. Grubbs as you stated is close too Nicks,but isn’t as good at pass blocking. Grubbs also missed 6 games last season.
I read an article on Mathis that stated he was the best guard in 2011. Mathis played in 7 games( starting in none) as a Phin in 08. He is injury prone. Mathis has stared in only 37 games in his 8 year career. So far Mathis is a 1 year wonder. I prefer Nicks who is more consistent. Nicks has started every game the last 3 season and 13 of 16 his rookie year.
The addition of Nicks would elevate the O-line to top 5 instantly .
"If you are what you say you are, you wouldn't have to say it."
"It's OK to be a follower, as long as you're following the right leader." – Smithology
"You Play To Win The Game" - Herman Edwards
Mathis wasn't always a starter and he's not a one year wonder.
He graded out very well in 2009 as well.
- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.
Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider.
Follow me on Twitter @Finhead83.
My point exactly
Mathis wasn’t always a starter. The question is why? Was he injured? Or maybe he just not that good. In 09 he may graded well,but he only started 7 games out the 15 he played. Did he start get because someone got hurt? Another thing. Where was he in 10. Mathis could have played in 128 games in his 8 year career. He has played in 73 games starting only in 37. That’s 55 games he missed. By contrast Nicks has played in more games than missed. Nick has played in all 64 games he was able to starting in 61.
"If you are what you say you are, you wouldn't have to say it."
"It's OK to be a follower, as long as you're following the right leader." – Smithology
"You Play To Win The Game" - Herman Edwards
by NawlinsPhinFan on Feb 11, 2012 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
He was a backup to Nate Livings in Cincy.
Not all greats start out as starters. Even Carl Nicks was slated to be a backup with the Saints, but then Jamar Nesbit was suspended. You make your mark when given a chance. Nicks made his mark a bit earlier in his career when Nesbit was suspended. Mathis made his mark when Livings was injured.
Yeremiah Bell also spent 3 years as a backup before he got his start at SS. Sometimes players hit their stride in different times in their career. Just because Mathis was a backup for some years it doesn’t mean he’s not a good guard.
- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.
Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider.
Follow @Finhead83
Why didn't you include Mike Brisiel?
He is probably the best zone blocking RG out in free agency. Plus didn’t the Dolphins release Mathis once upon a time?
by kermit the frogger29 on Feb 10, 2012 6:33 PM EST reply actions
Because I don't expect Miami to use much zone blocking.
That’s why I also didn’t mention Chris Myers as a potential center.
- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.
Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider.
Follow me on Twitter @Finhead83.
If they go west coast offense they better be doing zone blocking
by kermit the frogger29 on Feb 10, 2012 9:56 PM EST up reply actions
really good read up on zone blocking
http://www.hawgtuff.net/ZONE%20BLOCKING%20-%20THE%20WAVE%20OF%20THE%20FUTURE!.pdf
by kermit the frogger29 on Feb 10, 2012 10:02 PM EST up reply actions
They don't have to.
Nearly all teams have some zone blocking in them. It’s not an uncommon thing now. You also have to realize though that not all West Coast Offenses have primarily zone blocking schemes. While many do, some don’t. There are so many different variations of the WCO that you can’t say one applies to all. It’s not just San Francisco’s WCO now.
Green Bay did use primarily zone blocking, but I don’t think that it means Miami will automatically do that right out of the gate. It’ll probably depend a lot on the personnel on the OL and how Philbin feels Bush and Thomas could handle the responsibilities for the RB. I do believe we will eventually convert to a primary zone blocking scheme, but I am not certain we will see it this year.
- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.
Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider.
Follow me on Twitter @Finhead83.
No doubt Philbin will make final decision but
Mike Sherman will take the leading role in what offensive schemes we will be using, and everywhere he’s been he has implemented a WCO zone blocking system. That is one of the main reasons Kubiak wanted him as a OC in Houston because his familiarity with WCO style offense similar to the system Mike Shanahan operates. Both men like quicker and more agile offensive linemen that are proficient in zone blocking, plus Sherman was assitant HC when the Texans drafted him in 2006 although he only played in 4 games when Sherman was OC in 2007. I really think this will be the guard they get this offseason, but who knows.
by kermit the frogger29 on Feb 11, 2012 12:53 AM EST up reply actions
I'd see him as an option if he was successful at it...
But he was merely just average. I know Sherman prefers zone blocking and I do think Miami will use it eventually, but they just don’t have the personnel for it now.
- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.
Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider.
Follow @Finhead83
Not to beat a dead horse
but Brisiel would be a excellent RG for us, he may be smaller than what we’re used to 6’5 300lbs but he is one tough son-of-bitch. Last year he broke his leg during the first half of the Cincinnati game but continued to play with a broken leg the rest of the second half without one complaint, and the Bengals front were no slouches. I don’t know about you but that is the type of guard I want in front of me if I’m a running back looking for a seam.
by kermit the frogger29 on Feb 11, 2012 1:19 AM EST up reply actions
I actually like Mathis as an underrated signing
he’ll come a lot cheaper plus as the number one rated run blocking guard it can only mean good tthings for bush and Thomas and yes I know this is a passing league but it can’t hurt to help out our 1000 yard back the same offseason we help our 1000 yard WR
"You can do more, you can always do more." - Dan Marino
by Miamiboi84 on Feb 10, 2012 7:43 PM EST via Android app reply actions
Wow
I didn’t realize Jake Scott was that good. 3 sacks in 3 years…that’s pretty solid. I say if we target one of the above, Jake Scott would be our best bang for our buck! I like Grubbs, but it’d be a more expensive to do so.

by 






















