Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

The Evolution of Passing in the NFL

How would this man do if he was playing in today's NFL? (Photo by Andy Marlin/Getty Images for EA Sports)

This will be the start another series of weekly topics about views on the Dolphins, the AFC East, and the NFL in general. I'm going to start this on a subject that has been talked about for years, especially among Dolphin fans looking for a franchise QB. National media has talked about this as well more recently thanks to Drew Brees setting a new season passing record and two other QBs that topped the 5,000 yards passing mark in a single season. This week I'd like to talk about the evolution of the passing game over the past few decades and ideas to balance the league. More specifically, we'll look at the rule changes that allowed the passing game to open.

The first shift in passing in modern football came about in the 1970s. It started in 1974 when the NFL restricted the amount of contact defenders could have with a WR. Before then, CBs typically mauled WRs not just at the line of scrimmage, but along their routes. The NFL added additional measures in 1977 when they allowed defenders to make contact with a WR only once. The adoption of a 16-game regular season in the same year would also benefit with the increased passing numbers over the course of a season and a career. The rules would be altered once again in 1978 when defenders were able to maintain contact with a WR within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage, but were unable to make contact beyond that point. This was the start of the modern illegal contact rule. This rule though was not heavily enforced for many years though. In the same year, the NFL allowed offensive linemen to extend their arms and use open hands in pass protection, allowing them more time to protect the QB. Some violent hits, such as directly striking or swinging for the head, neck, or face were prohibited in 1980 when they were added under "personal foul" penalties. This may not have helped much, but you could argue that healthier WRs equates to a better passing game. Still, there were plenty reasons for WRs to fear the footsteps of a safety.

Since 1995, the NFL has allowed a WR forced out of bounds by a defender to return in bounds and make a play. This helped eliminate the move of "chucking" a WR out of bounds to remove him from a play. In 1996, the NFL announced they'd actually enforce the illegal contact penalty, created in 1978, more stringently than before. The rule was no longer just a recommendation. In 2001, the NFL announced Roughing the QB penalty would be enforced more strictly and specifically targeted late hits. By 2002, they protected the QB even further by barring helmet-to-helmet contact with a QB at any time, even after a change of possession. The NFL again tightened down enforcement of already existing rules for illegal contact, pass interference, and defensive holding in 2004. QBs received even more protection in 2006 when the NFL barred hits to the QBs below their knees unless the defensive player was blocked into the QB. WRs saw additional protection in 2009 when contact to the head of a defenseless receiver was prohibited. The NFL expanded the rules for defenseless receivers to include all players in 2010. They also threatened an additional crackdown on these penalties and threatened players with suspensions.

Star-divide

As you can see from the recap of the rules, it wasn't until the mid-90s when defensive players were called out more for penalties and in the past 5 years, the QBs and receivers have enjoyed much more protection than ever before. Does a WR need to fear the safety's foot steps now that he knows he can't be hit until he gets both feet on the ground? Would players like Steve Atwater and John Lynch still make it in today's NFL?

The shift in passing has been obvious, but I think only so much of it has to do with the evolution of players themselves. I don't believe better talent at QB is necessarily the answer, but I do think the emergence of receiving TEs has played a nice benefit. Still, I think the largest factor to the passing game we see now is attributed to major rule changes in the name of player safety.

While I am all for the protection of player safety, I do fear so much power has been stripped from defenses. I understand that sports is offensive-minded. Just like the NFL, other sports such as the NBA (more fouls for less contact), MLB (allowing steroids teams moving in fences for more HRs), and NHL (widening the nets) have all adjusted their own ways to favor more offense.

Prior to 2008, a QB has only surpassed 5,000 yards passing in a season only a single time. Brees became the second QB to reach that milestone in 2008. In 2011, 3 QBs alone topped 5,000 passing yards. Only 10 years ago, surpassing 7.0 YPA for a QB was considered very good. Only 11 QBs would reach that mark. 10 QBs surpassed that mark in 2003. By 2008, 17 QBs reached that mark. Over the years, we've changed what we have come to expect from QBs. A 60% completion percentage was once considered a milestone for a successful season. In 1983, only 8 QBs completed over 60% of their passes. 20 QBs surpassed that in 2010. Now, that is just the baseline for a QB. In 1983, when the defense still had an even ground, 10 QBs had 5% or more of their passes intercepted, including John Elway and Ken Stabler. Only 4 QBs, including Dan Marino, had less than 3% of their passes intercepted. In 2010, only a single QB had 5% or more of his passes be intercepted. On the flip side, 18 QBs had less than 3% of their passes intercepted. Offensive production has come at the sacrifice of the defense. At some point, there needs to be an even balance between offense and defense. So how would I recommend balancing out the two sides?

I won't try to remove rule changes for player safety because we already know that won't happen. Though I would be more lenient with incidental contact to the helmet, specifically when a defender's hand comes in contact with a QB's helmet or when a defender's shoulder hits a WR in the chest. Instead, I would alter the illegal contact rules. I'd like to see the 5-yard gap given for legal contact between a CB and a WR extended to 10 yards. With all the protection a QB gets, I think the extra 5 yards would help the defense greatly. Top running WRs may see a drop in value due to more contact slowing them down unless they can break free, but the WRs that are more physical, like Brandon Marshall, would be more impactful. It may not seem like much, but the split second longer could be all the time in the world for football. Beyond that, I may also look to tighten down the rules on offensive pass interference. A defender is already fighting an uphill battle when the WR can almost maul him, but the slightest contact a defender makes with a WR will be flagged for pass interference.

That is my idea for balancing out the passing game and giving the defense a little bit more power. What would you do to reverse the trend? Would you reverse the trend at all?

--------------------------------------

Comment 22 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Weinner!

A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke.
- Groucho Marx
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. -H.L. Mencken.
"Never miss an opportunity to make others happy, even if you have to leave them alone in order to do it."
"The world is divided into two kinds of people: those who have tattoos, and those who are afraid of people with tattoos."

by Alpha6 on Jan 10, 2012 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice post, and I agree with much of what you have to say.

Will never change though if the players union have their way.

by BahamaDolfan on Jan 10, 2012 5:29 PM EST reply actions  

Good post

Not sure about extending the 5 yard bump rule, because it would practically eliminate smaller WR’s who can beat the initial jam with quickness, but can’t sustain high speeds. Think Davone Bess and Wes Welker. They are going to have a hard time running routes other than slants and quick outs.
I would be a little more forgiving on the hand fighting and jostling at the top of the route. Give the corners more leeway to play the ball and battle for it, and reward good coverage, instead of making coverage easier.
Also, what about, say, allowing hits below the shoulders on defenseless WR’s? Still focused on player safety by limiting and penalizing head shots, but allow hard hitting safeties to still have an impact with big shots to the chest/ribs…

Phinsider HOF C/O 2009
Winner of Six Career Matty Awards
Vice Grand Poobah of the RGIII Fleet
Occupy Joe Robbie

by Little Nicky 21 on Jan 10, 2012 5:40 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

Defenseless Receivers

That is what I meant when I’d be more lenient on the defenseless receiver penalties. It is only considered a penalty if the receiver is hit in the helmet. A shot to the chest is not considered a hit on a defenseless receiver, but flags are often thrown because it often looks like a hit to the helmet. Pretty much, if the call is in doubt, the refs throw the flag.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider

by Finhead83 on Jan 10, 2012 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think you should be allowed to throw the challenge flag on the headshots to QB's and defenseless receivers.

The game is moving way too fast for a ref to make the right call many times. Let a coach throw the flag so it can be reviewed. Too many times guys are thrown into the quarterback or a solid hit to the chest looks like a helmet to helmet shot.

by mjams on Jan 10, 2012 6:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Also, what if you kept the contact within 5yds rule for wideouts but made it 10yds for TE's?

That would help create a more diverse defensive strategy for dealing with all these dual threat TE’s. You could choose to match them with solid coverage from a nickel back/safety or manhandle him with a linebacker.

by mjams on Jan 10, 2012 6:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Some violent hits, such directly striking or swinging for the head, neck, or face.

I don’t understand this (non) sentence. Were such hits allowed, blocked, or regularly practiced at that point, and on which players?

by discuit on Jan 10, 2012 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

I adjusted it

It was outlawed for all types of tackles, not just aimed at a position. This was the end of many of those clothesline type tackles defensive players used to make.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider

by Finhead83 on Jan 10, 2012 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Very nice read !! Rec'd 83

TO ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE; ONE MUST STUDY,TO ACQUIRE WISDOM ONE MUST OBSERVE !!
YOU ARE NOT BORN A WINNER, YOU ARE NOT BORN A LOSER, YOU ARE WHAT YOU MAKE YOURSELF BECOME !!
WHEN TEXASCOWPUNK TAKES THE PICTURE I WILL HAVE AN AVATAR!!! OIL BABY!!!

by 21Dave on Jan 10, 2012 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

In 10 years the league will be two-hand touch.

I'm ALL- IN. Do whatever it takes to get Andrew Luck or RGIII to Miami in 2012.
Laces out!
-2008 AFC East Champions-
BRANDON MARSHALL- FUTURE MIAMI HOF WR!!!!!
Tom Brandstater- more TD's than completions. Last person to tell him that's not possible, well, nobody has seen him since.

by BSerious72 on Jan 10, 2012 7:00 PM EST reply actions  

i dont think so

If you look at nfl trends of the past, they only last like 20 or 25 years. Look at the option offense, ground and pound, etc. I think high powered passing will die out as this generation goes. The hgh powered passing was started by marino, but we were the early adopters, it became league-wide around the time peyton manning came in. Its should expire around the time the current young stars, like stafford, newton, etc. retire. What it will be replaced by, I don’t know, but the nfl will change even further, that’s for sure.

Admiral of the RGIII "Robert Griffin"
Carolina OC Chudzinski for HC.
Grand Cardinal of the first holy church of brandstater

by AnishB15 on Jan 10, 2012 7:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

They could take the helmets off?

The defenders could also learn to tackle better. I don’t mean this in a sarcastic way, being from a rugby playing country, but since the way you can hit a player is changing, players must be able to tackle better. I have seen players, whose job is only to defend, use shockingly bad tecnique in tackling.

by sirdolphin on Jan 10, 2012 7:03 PM EST reply actions  

Actually...

Many have advocated the removal of the face masks. They believe that with such head protection it causes players to become fearless and make the type of hits we see today. They think with the removal of the face masks football players would revert to learning tackling techniques that protected their head. You may have meant it as a joke, but there are a lot of people who genuinely back that.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider

by Finhead83 on Jan 10, 2012 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Not really joking, though don't expect it to happen.

If the type of hits that require that protection are all outlawed though, why wear the pads and helmets? There’s going to be a lot of broken legs if the players hit low with helmets.

by sirdolphin on Jan 10, 2012 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

excellant post

To answer the question under the pic, if marino played in the nfl today, he would have had over 5500 yards, maybe even 6000.

Admiral of the RGIII "Robert Griffin"
Carolina OC Chudzinski for HC.
Grand Cardinal of the first holy church of brandstater

by AnishB15 on Jan 10, 2012 7:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

ROI's on fraud slow? lol

A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke.
- Groucho Marx
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. -H.L. Mencken.
"Never miss an opportunity to make others happy, even if you have to leave them alone in order to do it."
"The world is divided into two kinds of people: those who have tattoos, and those who are afraid of people with tattoos."

by Alpha6 on Jan 10, 2012 7:19 PM EST reply actions  

Aren't they always?

But this wasn’t written at work!

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

Contributing Writer to the The Phinsider

by Finhead83 on Jan 10, 2012 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

15 years to late!

wopper "the king" computer
We often look rite past the positive's cuz the negative's-r-so hard they dominate! Have you touched & preened your beaver-pelt yet!
Chyt; cha aint seen the worst tilo youd seen the least - Henne to Marshall compleat two year descreption!

by wild zion beaver on Jan 11, 2012 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

12

2010 The Jim Mandich NewsFlash Award Winner.

Miss the misery.
Need a reason for a change.
Need a reason to explain.
So turn it on again.
Don't change your mind.
You're wasting light.

by Patssuck456 on Jan 22, 2012 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Up Next....

the future is looking us right in the face (and I hope it will be doing so wearing aqua and green for the next fifteen years). I’m referring specifically to RGIII and in more general terms, scrambling QBs such as Vick and Cam. As the pass mileage adds up, defenses will focus on CBs and safeties to cut down that chunk yardage. The next evolution is QBs will can kill you with accurate throws and, when you take that away, can torch you with their feet as well. Mike Vick ( and even Kordel Stewart) were the front runners (ba domp… ching!) to the style, but unrefined. The passing was not married to the running ability. Vick is evolving, but the league is not ready to embrace it. The team(s) that jump on the wagon first and can develop specialized coaching techniques for those type of QBs will dominate the early years of the next phase of the NFL paradigm shift for the new decade.

by PhinNomenol! on Jan 10, 2012 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's community dedicated to the only franchise in NFL history to have an undefeated team: the Miami Dolphins!

FanPosts


Head Coach

Miamidolphins_small Kevin Nogle

Coordinators

Lcffsig_small LeftCoastFinFan

Tcp_small texascowpunk

Jake_long_small kmb8488

Assistant Coaches

Kdog_medium_small Kdog92

Dan_marino1_small Finhead83

Appmichigan2_small The Earl

Miami-dolphins-rough-ipad-1024emboss_small AlejandroN