Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Fantasy Football Week 2: Start 'em and Sit 'em


Last week, I started the first of the weekly feature on who to sit and who to start.  You can read the previous post here.  Before I start the start 'em and sit 'em for this week, I will recap the good and ugly in last week's predictions.

The Good:

Kevin Kolb finished with 309 passing yards and 2 TDs for 24 points.

Mark Sanchez finished with 335 yards, 2 TDs, and an offer for a spread in the magazine Seventeen.  24 points, earning him the Rex Ryan game toe on Sunday Night.

I advised people to sit Donovan McNabb and he definitely made my prediction a solid hit.  His39 passing yards, 1 TD, and an INT was poor by any QB's standards.  Only 9 points for this aging QB.

Sam Bradford faced a tough defense as I predicted and finished with 188 yards and 0 TDs.  4 points.

Kerry Collins finished with 197 and 1 TD, but lost 2 fumbles.  I expected him to have breakdowns with WRs, but not with the center as well.  A poor 9 points.

I predicted Felix Jones to have a solid game running and receiving out of the backfield.  His 66 total yards is decent, but the TD makes it a solid start.  12 points.

Star-divide

I said I believed Reggie Bush would pick up yards, even if his YPC were low, because Miami would make sure he had the ball in his hands and he'd be a factor in the passing game.  That prediction was nailed.  Bush finished with 9 receptions and 94 yards later, I was right.  Bush added a cherry on top with a TD.  20 points.

I didn't think Reshard Mendenhall would have a good game and that ended up true as well.  Mendenhall finished with 45 yards, which isn't bad against Baltimore, but a lost fumble brought his fantasy score to 2.

I thought Mike Williams of TB would have a solid day.  The 4 receptions were ok and his 45 receiving yards was merely average, but his TD made him a good start.  13 points.

I cautioned to sit Steve Smith of the Eagles and thankfully not the one in Carolina.  This Eagle finished with 0 catches or yards.

I won't really count Sidney Rice, but I did caution people to leave him out until the Seahawks would announce he would play.  He was expected to be a gametime decision, but come Saturday, I think we knew he wasn't playing.

I picked the trio of Anthony Gonzalez, Austin Collie, and Pierre Garcon to struggle in Indy.  Gonzalez and Collie finished without a catch and Garcon finished with 3 receptions for 39 yards.  Hat trick! 3 points total for this group.

I believed Ben Watson would have a big day and while his 45 yards on 3 receptions were only average, the TD made him a good start.  12 points.

I said Dustin Keller would be targeted more, especially early in the season, and Sanchez looked to him often.  Keller finished with 5 receptions for 61 yards and a TD.  Solid start with 14 points.

Push Picks:

I cautioned to sit Shockey because I thought Greg Olsen was the better start.  Shockey finished with 3 receptions for 51 points.  It was an average game and he finished with 6 points.

Mario Manningham finished with 4 receptions for 49 yards.  Not a solid outing and less than what I expected from a WR accustomed to making big yards out of his receptions.  7 points still isn't bad for a WR depending on your depth.

The bad:

Todd Heap finished with 2 receptions for 40 yards.  I expected Kolb to use his TE a lot, but plenty of yards and the TD went to Arizona's other TE, Jeff King.  Oops!

I warned people to sit Colt McCoy because I thought the Browns would handle the Bengals quite easily and run the ball often.  Well, the Browns lost and McCoy passed for 213 yards with 2 TDs.  Fail.

I believed Joseph Addai would be a good start as I figured Indy would run more often.  Addai finished with 52 total yards and 2 receptions.  He ran well, but he only ran 8 times.  Maybe next week the Colts will realize Kerry Collins is not Peyton Manning and will turn to Addai more often...

I thought Shonn Greene would be more productive and be a quality start, but Tomlinson finished with more yards.  Green had a low YPC and finished with only 33 yards rushing.

I thought BenJarvus Green-Ellis was a risky play because he is a short yardage back in a crowded backfield.  The 34 rushing yards made him a below average start.  His TD made him a quality start.  In other news, Benny Sapp was just burned in the air when John Moynahan, Tom Brady's son, crawled by him on a Tuesday morning warmup.

I didn't expect Cedric Benson to have a good game as the Bengals passing offense was unimpressive and Cleveland would focus on him.  Oops.  Benson finished with 121 rushing yards and a TD.  There's life in the Bengal offense after all.

As with every Bengal offensive player, I thought Jermaine Gresham was risky because of Andy Dalton.  Gresham only finished with 58 yards and a TD.  His 14 points was only beneficial if you started someone not named Tom Brady or Wes Welkeron your team.  If you did, you didn' need Gresham.

I also expected Jerheme Urban to have a good game for Kansas City over Buffalo.  Nobody had a good game for KC.  Urban didn't even show up, being limited to 0 yards on 0 catches.

So 16 picks I believe were solid and 7 that betrayed me.  Not too bad I suppose.  Better luck to me this week!  So who do I suggest you start and sit?

Start 'em:

QBs:

Any QB facing Benny Sapp.

Chad Henne:  It definitely looks like Miami will pass more often and Henne was always capable of getting yards through the air.  He looked very good last week and is worth a start.  Besides, you know how much crap we gave to Benny Sapp on Monday Night until his release?  Well, we gave that much crap to Jason Allen for several years and he's still employed by the very team Chad Henne is facing.  That is worth a start right there.

Kyle Orton:  Denver can't run the ball and will have to rely on Orton, even if he doesn't look very good or the Broncos fail to win.  That means Orton should be able to put up over 200 yards through the air and should pick up at least 1 TD.

Rex Grossman: He managed a good game against the Giants and I expect a repeat performance against an average Arizone defense.  If close to 200 yards and a TD is good for you, he's worth a start.

Sit 'Em:

Tarvaris Jackson:  He's going against Pittsburgh this week.  Consider it a gift if he gives you a full game this week.

Luke McCown:  He was efficient last week, but did not throw for a TD.  He's going against a tough Jet secondary this week and don't expect many yards or TDs.  150 yards and a TD may end up being the result, but he may have a turnover or 2 as well.

RBs:

Start 'em:

Ryan Grant:  The Packers should be in control of the game, allowing them to run the ball more than they did last week in their shootout with New Orleans.  Grant should see more yards and carries.  He should have close to 70 total yards.  He may also get a TD as well unless James Starks takes the opportunity from him.

Reggie Bush:  Like last week, he'll see the ball often, even if his YPC still aren't very high.  He should have over 60 total yards if you are looking for a 3rd RB to start or your short on depth.

Sit 'em:

Marshawn Lynch:  He generally has a low YPC and don't expect that number or his carries to increase against Pittsburgh.  If you can play Chad Henne as your RB, that may be a better option.

Ryan Mathews: The Patriots DL is tough to run against and when the Chargers are inside the 5, the short yard TD will go to Mike Tolbert.  That makes Matthews a risky play.

WRs:

Start 'em:

Jacoby JonesKevin Walter is injured and Jones is a big play threat who Houston may try to match up against Will Allen and Nolan Carroll.  He can easily rack up over 60 yards in Houston's high octane offense and may score a big TD.

Devery Henderson and Robert Meachem:  With Marques Colston out for up to a month, Henderson and Meachem will already see more targets than they already do.  In a high octane offense with playmakers such as these two, that means good things for the owners of these players.  The Bears are a tough defense, but it's hard to sit players on such a great offense.

Mohamed Massaquoi:  He looks to be healthy and is McCoy's go-to target.  The Colts CBs aren't very good and Massaquoi should have his share of catches and yards, even if he doesn't score a TD.

Davone Bess:  Remember Jason Allen?  He will match up with Bess.  That should be enough to start him.  Bess is Henne's favorite target and should see at least 4 receptions for 50+ yards.

Sit 'em

Mike Thomas (Jac):  I'm not going to name every WR going against Revis, but he also has an underwhelming QB throwing to him.  This makes it a less than ideal situation.

Doug Baldwin:  It's easy to overreact to a strong week 1 performance, and Baldwin may be the biggest stud-to-dud of the week 1 to week 2 performers.  Sidney Rice is likely to return for Seattle and once again, you have a very mediocre QB and a good defense, despite what you may have seen during the Steelers-Ravens game.  Don't be fooled by Baldwin's week one numbers.

Anthony Gonzalez:  He makes an appearance on the sit list for his second straight week.  He may be in his final year for the Colts as he's been surpassed by other WRs and the ball won't be spread around quite like it was with Peyton Manning.  Gonzalez's numbers are likely to be less than average for the entire season.  His only hope is Austin Collie and Pierre Garcon suffers injuries before he does.

TEs:

Start 'em:

Greg Olsen:  He definitely looks like the go-to TE in Carolina and with Shockey as a very good underneath TE option, Olsen may end up being a big play TE that can be a threat in the deep middle, especially since safeties will roll toward the sideline for Steve Smith.  With the great CB tandem in Green Bay, Newton will have to start looking inside to gain yards.

Jake BallardEli Manning has always loved using his TEs and Ballard is separating himself as the #1 TE with the Giants.  He had 59 yards on 3 receptions last week and I expect his numbers to be similar this week.

Owen Daniels:  It's not just a TE vs Miami thing, but he is a very good TE with a very good QB in an offense that can put up points.  Remember, Houston was #2 in the NFL in my Total Offensive Production stats.  This is a very good offense and he's a very good weapon.

Kellen Winslow: The Vikings have a pretty good CB duo and Freeman often looks to Winslow.  The Chargers chose to attack Minnesota with TE Antonio Gates, being targeted 14 times last week.  Expect the Bucs to follow a similar spproach.

Sit 'em:

Jared Cook and Craig Stevens:  With Ed Reed and Ray Lewis in the middle of the field, Stevens is going to have a hard time getting yards in the middle of the field.  He can be a good start in some weeks because Kenny Britt will draw attention, but don't bank on him this week.

Leonard Pope:  He's not going to be the same type of TE as Tony Moeaki for Kansas City.  He may get receptions, but he won't make big yards out of those receptions.  His value may be higher in PPR leagues.

This fanpost was written by one of The Phinsider's registered users.

Comment 46 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

James Starks?

I had heard that Starks would be getting the bulk of the carries, has anyone else heard anything? Also thanks to my blind faith in Chad Henne I won last week, in your face media!!!!! Choke on it.

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Winston Churchill

Never give in, never give in, never; never; never- in nothing, great or small, large or petty- never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense
Winston Churchill

by kevyfranchise on Sep 15, 2011 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

They'll split carries probably

They should both see a good amount again and Starks isn’t a bad play either. Personally, I like Grant a little more because I think he has more to offer out of the backfield. Starks had 3 more carries and they both had similar yards (57 for Starks and 45 for grant) and there is a good chance they’ll both see a bit of an increase.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think so

We are going to have to disagree on this one. Starks saw way more snaps on the field than Grant. It was 45 to 16. Starks is the better player and will be the featured back. They should be running more this week going against a weaker opponent in Carolina.

Draft Earl Thomas Bandwagon!

by troynuke on Sep 15, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is true that he had a lot more last week

Starks also struggled as the 3rd down back and the Packers OC, Joe Filbin, they plan to try and give Starks and Grant equal carries. Starks is the more explosive runner, but Grant is the better receiver out of the backfield and a much better blocker. This is why I expect to see more equal snaps this week. Starks will probably be the main guy of the future, but the Packers are still high on Grant and when you have a QB as valuable as Rodgers, you’d like to have someone you feel can protect him and would be a good receiving outlet for him.

Starks isn’t the featured back just yet. It’s still a split backfield.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice job last week

now I have another question or in need of some opinions
should I start Freeman or Henne…Freeman seems like a safe bet and is solid week to week but not starting Henne last week lost my game(but who knew he would do that honestly)I like the way Henne looked in the pre-season and he looked like the qb we have been in need of on Monday..but still Im a little bit cautious

Winner Of The 2009 Phinsider Predict The Pick Contest, Creator Of The Phinsider Annual Mock Draft,Dolphin Fan 4 Life No Matter What,
WillFoy518@twitter.....give me a follow enjoy seeing others opinions and such regarding our beloved Phins.

by Foy on Sep 15, 2011 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

That'll be a close one

I may be a little biased on this one, but I do think I have some good reasoning for my response as well. I’d go with Henne because I think he will carry over a bit from last week’s performance. Unless Miami shows they can really move the ball on the ground, most of Miami’s yards will come from Chad Henne’s yards. The big factor will be whether or not Henne passes for a TD and if he throws INTs. I would expect at least 1 TD and he has shown improvement in decision making as far as limiting poor throws. Unfortunately, unless our defense improvesover last week, which they should, Henne will be playing from behind once again and his arm will get a heck of a workout.

Freeman is still a good option, but the Vikings still have a pretty good CB duo of Antoine Winfield and Cedric Griffin. Not only that, but unless McNabb shows a drastic improvement, I think the Bucs may have control of this game. The Vikings are untested in the middle of the DL and with a RB like Blount, TB may give them a bit of a test this week. They should run the ball more than they did against Detroit last week.

In the end, I would not be surprised if Freeman has more fantasy points. He certainly has the potential for a 250+ yard game with a TD, but I feel that Henne has more of an opportunity.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good Insight thanks

Winner Of The 2009 Phinsider Predict The Pick Contest, Creator Of The Phinsider Annual Mock Draft,Dolphin Fan 4 Life No Matter What,
WillFoy518@twitter.....give me a follow enjoy seeing others opinions and such regarding our beloved Phins.

by Foy on Sep 15, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also have an opinion question for you,

who do you think I should start this week, Matt Ryan or Sam Bradford? Ryan would be my first gut answer, but he is going up against the Eagles secondary. Bradford meanwhile is going up against a banged up Giants secondary, but doesn’t have the quality of receivers that Ryan has.

"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue
I can't brain today, I have the dumb.
28 "Phinsider Feud" Points

by Chupathingy on Sep 15, 2011 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I would go with Ryan. Bradford has a banged up finger and Amendola is out. Steven Jackson is also injured so the running game is basically gone. The Eagles have crappy linebackers and Turner will be blazing them. That means the secondary will have to help. This should help open things up for Ryan. He is also 12-2 at home, I believe. If not it is still something ridiculous like that. They got embarassed by the Bears so they will be gunning to take someone out.

Draft Earl Thomas Bandwagon!

by troynuke on Sep 15, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Bradford looks relatively healthy, which he does for now, I'd go with him

The Eagles have a deep secondary, but it’s their front seven that teams will attack. With Michael Turner, expect Atlanta to scale back on their passing attack and instead, try to defeat the Eagles with plenty of rushes, in turn, controlling the clock and keeping Vick off the field.

Bradford is going against a banged up Giants defense that was bounced around by Rex Grossman and Company last week. Neither of them are great starts, but I’d give Bradford the nod as long as he doesn’t appear to regress. His injury was nothing serious and even though Amendola may be out, he’ll still have Sims-Walker and Gibson to throw the ball to. Need another reason to look for Bradford to shoulder the load even more? Steven Jackson is injured and may not play. If he does, he will not be at 100%.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

what about a flex-option in a PPR 16 team league..

Hartline got me 14 last week. Anthony Armstrong 10 & Woodhead 7

I like the match up that Armstrong is facing but he did have 2 drops last game
I also think Hartline seems to be a Henne fav..
& Woodhead has been boom or bust same as the other 2

What do you think Finhead83?

Head Of Security.. I am Matty & Mosuls' personal Yuri Boyka.
Airborne Army Ranger - 1996-2007
Post A Link To An Illegal Site To Watch A Game & I Will Use My Security Powers, Please just email some one to see where to watch it!
2011 - Want to win more Jerseys? Join our Fantasy leagues! Always Free!
God Have Mercy On My Enemies Because I Will Not!

by E_Dove on Sep 15, 2011 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Kind of a tough one

Armstrong has a pretty favorable matchup, but he only caught 33% of the passes thrown to him and didn’t record many yards. The TD saved him.

 Hartline had more targets, cathes, and yards than Armstrong. He also faces a favorable matchup because Houston will try to get Joseph on Marshall, but they’re thin at CB behind Joseph.

Woodhead will get yards, but is a risky one because he doesn’t get many TDs. He shares carries and will never get the goal line carries.

It’d be hard to expect Hartline and Armstrong, two players not known particularly known for having a nose for the endzone. I may give Hartline an advantage because the Chargers have a good D and I think Hartline is the likeliest to get a score, as unlikely as that may have seemed a few months ago.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Meant to say it'd be hard to expect Hartline and Armstrong to score 2 weeks in a row.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

thanks so much for all your doing!

I guess I will go with Hartline, I remember Henne looking for him around the redzone most of the time Henning allowed a pass. Thanks again!

Head Of Security.. I am Matty & Mosuls' personal Yuri Boyka.
Airborne Army Ranger - 1996-2007
Post A Link To An Illegal Site To Watch A Game & I Will Use My Security Powers, Please just email some one to see where to watch it!
2011 - Want to win more Jerseys? Join our Fantasy leagues! Always Free!
God Have Mercy On My Enemies Because I Will Not!

by E_Dove on Sep 15, 2011 9:55 PM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

Felix

Definitely.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

How did that go this week?

Tolbert does suck. I don’t know who said it but he does. Ryan Mathews is the star there and he will show it the more he gets the ball.

Draft Earl Thomas Bandwagon!

by troynuke on Sep 21, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Long question

I won my game mainly because i started welker, but i have several long questions
1.I have Ryan Torain from the redskins, whats wrong with him? How long will he be out and if not indefinetly, how much value does he have? is he useless?

2.At QB i have Cam Newton and Philip Rivers. Obviously Rivers is the starter and i have no need for cam. I also have a bad WR situation (My starters are B. Edwards and Welker). Should i trade cam and/or braylon for a better WR and if so who?

3. I don’t know who to start at the flex. I had Ryan Torain there last week, and i also have Mohamed Massaquoi (picked him up just now per ur advice), James Starks, Julio Jones, and Jordy Nelson. Who gets the start?

by PhinPhan910 on Sep 15, 2011 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Torain

I had Torain too. He is good for the system, but he was injured. He should be back in a few weeks, but he’ll be behind Hightower and Helu. Don’t expect that to change unless Hightower struggles, but I don’t expect him to. The more Hightower produces, the further Torain’s value will sink. If you have thin free agent RB selections, he’s not bad because I think he’d split many carries with Helu if Hightower is injured.

When you have a top QB you plan to play every week, which you should with Rivers, there is never anything wrong with trading a backup. The bright side is Cam’s value is high right now. Just make sure you can trade for or sign another QB to replace Rivers during the bye week or in case he suffers an injury.

You have a bunch of quality options for the flex. Jordy Nelson and Julio Jones have big play potential, but GB has many weapons at WR and Jones has a tough matchup. I do think the Pack will run it a lot here and I think Starks is safe for 50 yards or so. Behind him, I’d go with Nelson, Massaquoi, and Jones in that order.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just struck up the trade

Traded Cam Newton for Mike Williams (TB). I think i got a steal there.

So now i need more help..

At the 2nd RB spot I have Cedric Benson and James Starks. Who should i start?
At WR I have:
- Wes Welker
- Braylon Edwards
- Julio Jones
- Mohamed Massaquoi
- Jordy Nelson
- Mike Williams (TB)
Which two should i start?
At flex, of the above RB’s and WR’s who should i start?

by PhinPhan910 on Sep 15, 2011 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Go with Benson

Denver can be run on and unlike Starks, Benson doesn’t share carries.

For the WRs, I’d lean to Welker even though he has a tough matchup. He is hardly ever shut out of the game. Jones and Williams have tough matchups and Nelson is only one of a dozen quality targets for Rodgers. As for Edwards and Massaquoi, Welker should have superior numbers than them.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I appreciate you doin this for us

With this being my first year this advice really helps me get a good feel for the way it goes, with that said I was wondering if i could get your opinion on a couple of hitches I have run into. First who would you start Roethlisberger seeking redemption vs the Seachickens or Henne vs Jason Allen, i think its a win win but which win do you think would be bigger? ok number 2 who would you start Philip Rivers vs the NE secondary or Mathew Stafford vs the Cheifs secondary who was lit up by Fitzpatrick and doesnt have Berry? same situation of win win I think but im leaning towards Stafford what do you think? and lastly, I have a three way fight for my flex spot, I have Tim Hightower who wil be looking to destroy his former team, Reggie Bush who should get good production as you said, and then Kenny Britt who will benefit from Baltimore staking the box, any opinions? thanks again for the help

by AcolyteofRa on Sep 15, 2011 4:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Good ones...

I’d still go with Roethlisberger over Henne because I’d be more conservative and let Henne show he can consistently show he can put up big numbers before I’d start him over someone proven like Roethlisberger. They both have potential to put up big points, but Ben is also safer.

For Rivers and Stafford, that is a tough one. Rivers typically puts up over 300 yards against NE so you’ll still get points. You should still get at least 1 TD too and with NE’s offense, the Chargers may have to air it because of NE’s defensive line and because NE can score. Stafford has huge point potential, but I wouldn’t expect the Chiefs to be that bad on D again. Stafford can still put up a lot of points, but I think Detroit’s offense may be a little more balanced. I’d still go with Rivers, though it’d be tempting to use Stafford. With a QB like Rivers, it’s tough to ever knock him out of the starting lineup.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 15, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Grossman is going to do well in WAS.

I thought he looked very good in the 2010 preseason and I think the WCO suits him.

Mercenaries never die. They just go to hell to regroup. - Unknown. I dont always make paradoxes, but when i do, i don't.- Brock Obama. Leading the fighter escort of SU-47s for the Lindley Bandwagon. Leader and Founder of the Ray Ray Armstrong for 2012 Bandwagon "pm striker king"- WZB.
Good, cheap FA upgrades out there: Gurode, E. Royster, L. Sheppard, J. KirkPatrick, K. O'Dowd, D. Thomas, D. Avery. Dolphins not pulling their weight: B. Sapp, J. Jerry, I. Alama-Francis, M. Columbo.

by PotM on Sep 15, 2011 5:14 PM EDT reply actions  

TE question

I have both Greg Olson and Tony Gonzalez. Who would you start?

by scottyboy10 on Sep 15, 2011 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

That's a good one

I go with Gonzo. Olsen looks to be a good start as well because GB has good CBs, but they’re both very good TEs. Gonzo has the better QB, better offense, and will be looked to often because of Philly’s CBs.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 7:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

i have a suggestion for these posts

you should do “sleeper” picks because it gives u a chance to express who you feel MAY have a good game with a side warning that it is still up to the owner because it is a slight risk

by insainsiren on Sep 15, 2011 5:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Not a bad idea I suppose.

I’ll give that a shot next week.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 7:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jason Allen had 8 ints last year.

He’s better than he gets credit for.

'Phins phor Liphe!

Draft The Newtron Bomb!

Sign Ortonimus Prime!

by joel311 on Sep 15, 2011 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

He had 6

And he is burnt more than blunt on April 20th. He can catch, but he struggles to cover.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, 6.

Still close to the top of the league.

'Phins phor Liphe!

Draft The Newtron Bomb!

Sign Ortonimus Prime!

by joel311 on Sep 16, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

That doesn't mean he was good. After all, DeAngelo Hall was ranked the 2nd worst CB in the NFL and had 6 INTs.

Jason Allen was ranked 73th best CB in the NFL last year… out of 83 CBs. His 52% success rate on 58 targets was middle of the pack, placing him at 46th in the NFL. On top of that, his 9.3 yards per pass was 10th worst in the NFL. You’d think his success rate isn’t that bad, but the average pass distance thrown toward Jason Allen was 16.7 yards, meaning QBs target him deep, which are generally less successful. Not surprising that he gets beat deep. After all, Braylon Edwards had 3 catches for over 20 yards, including receptions of 67 and 42 yards, in two games. At least his YAC is middle of the pack at 3.4.

Luckily, he’s not the worst on his team. Kareem Jackson’s 11.1 yards per pass on 73 targets were the worst in the NFL and his 47% success rate placed him 67th. Jackson was also the worst in YAC, leading the NFL with 6.0 YAC allowed.

Maybe Jason Allen is better than he gets credit for, but only because we joke about him being the worst CB in the NFL. It’s true, he’s not the worst. That award goes to his teammate that is starting in front of him.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wrs

starting 2 Wrs in a basic scoring league (non-PPR). i have Calvin Johnson, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall, and Reggie Wayne. (side note: it is only an 8 team league and it was auction based).

i started Johnson and White last week, but with White going up against Nandi i am leaning towards Marshall. Thoughts? Thanks in advance.

i've been waiting for this moment all my life...but it's not quite right.

by small balls on Sep 16, 2011 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Johnson is a definite start

It’s tough to ever sit White, but he is going against Nnamdi. I wasn’t overly impressed with Asomugha’s play last week, but still, he is Nnamdi. I’d probably go with Johnson and then Marshall as well. I’m not sold on Houston’s secondary and Miami will be passing a lot. Wayne is still a good target too, but he’ll be going against a very good Joe Haden and I’m not sure Collins will improve enough this week. Collins will get better and allow the Colts to improve, but I don’t see Wayne going off this week.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question for you

I am going to start Rice and Mcfadden at runningback and Marshall and Jackson at wr, who should i put in at flex Manningham or Starks or Fred Jackson? I used Manningham last week and he did nothing so i’m not sure what to do.

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Winston Churchill

Never give in, never give in, never; never; never- in nothing, great or small, large or petty- never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense
Winston Churchill

by kevyfranchise on Sep 16, 2011 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Manningham is still a good option

Fred Jackson is a very underrated RB though. Go with Jackson.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Go wih Jackson

he is playing against a mediocre Oakland Raiders defense this week

Founder and creator of the "DT33" nickname
"Ima take my talents to South Beach"--LeBron James
Strapped on to Ryan "El Capitan" Lindley's bandwagon 2012
"I make onions cry"--Tom Brandstater

by AlejandroN on Sep 16, 2011 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am really loving the fantasy help.

Thanks to everyone for taking the time

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Winston Churchill

Never give in, never give in, never; never; never- in nothing, great or small, large or petty- never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense
Winston Churchill

by kevyfranchise on Sep 16, 2011 9:13 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

TE

J. Finley GB or A. Hernandez NE?

Also, I have Brees as 1st QB, but thinking of dropping Freeman for Henne. Dumb Homerism, or anticipating a breakout?

Rookie Dolphins Fan Dylan Luc, born Oct. 26th, 2010..........Doing my part to increase the fan base......

by Red Dog on Sep 16, 2011 9:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd go with Hernandez

Once again, SD has some good CBs and Hernandez generally gets more targets than Finley.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 16, 2011 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

Rookie Dolphins Fan Dylan Luc, born Oct. 26th, 2010..........Doing my part to increase the fan base......

by Red Dog on Sep 17, 2011 7:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am impressed you can put aside your dolphins bias. It is a hard thing to do

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Winston Churchill

Never give in, never give in, never; never; never- in nothing, great or small, large or petty- never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense
Winston Churchill

by kevyfranchise on Sep 17, 2011 1:34 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

LOL Jason Allen

2010 The Jim Mandich NewsFlash Award Winner.

Miss the misery.
Need a reason for a change.
Need a reason to explain.
So turn it on again.
Don't change your mind.
You're wasting light.

by Patssuck456 on Sep 17, 2011 1:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I'd go with Winslow and Doucet.

- Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
- Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it.

by Finhead83 on Sep 17, 2011 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's community dedicated to the only franchise in NFL history to have an undefeated team: the Miami Dolphins!

FanPosts


Head Coach

Miamidolphins_small Kevin Nogle

Coordinators

Lcffsig_small LeftCoastFinFan

Tcp_small texascowpunk

Jake_long_small kmb8488

Assistant Coaches

Kdog_medium_small Kdog92

Dan_marino1_small Finhead83

Appmichigan2_small The Earl

Miami-dolphins-rough-ipad-1024emboss_small AlejandroN