Possible trade down scenario?

but otherwise it sound good to me

I just think if they wanted to get rid of VJack and get Spiller they could just trade him to someone for a first rounder, and then some

I just figured it would fill a need for both teams, but i understand your point. I just don’t know if the teams in the top, except for Cleveland, and Seattle might need RB. I personally think that it would cost the Chargers way to much to go that high, and trade into the top 10. That is why i figured if he fell to us, it would be the perfect time. They would save by not paying him as a top 10 prospect, and we could get our big WR.

They could trade up ahead of us also if they think we are in love with McClain…the trifecta could talk him up and maybe force a team to trade up for him, possibly dropping someone down to us, but who really knows? Good scenario on your part…that would be just fine with me also.

I do reserve the right of 1st nominee.

Dwyer is someone who’d fit the chargers alot better in terms of being a back who plays all 3 downs. But trading down is definitely something to consider if guys like dez bryant, mcclain, Jpp, and berry (oh god please let berry fall to miami!!!!!) are gone.

Vincent Jackson’s price is a 1st a 3rd and possibly a 5th. And even that is stretching it considering they just gave Rivers a huge contract and Jackson being his primary and only real proven target.
The scenario you are painting just doesn’t make sense at all so let’s not even discuss it. Don’t trying to be mean or anything. It’s just the truth.
What could happen is for us to draft Spiller and trade him and our 3rd for V Jackson.
And that would still be highly unlikely.

If somehow joe haden falls to us someone is going to give us a good deal to trade up

But i can’t see what trading our ONLY playmaker would do for us positively.

we do not need to focus on RB at all this year in the draft. We can find a cheap alternative out there in the FA pool. We really need to use this year to solve our enigma at WR, and get this poor kid some targets to throw to. And why can’t we use our TE more is beyond me!!!! Not only will it give Heene more time to throw the ball, but it would open the middle of the field by pulling some of the LB’s out to cover them. Second, or first, (doesn’t matter really), we need to get this defense TOUGH, and young ASAP. We were so good against the run in the early part of last season, but faded away when Fergie got hurt. We need physical beasts that love the game and play with reckless abandon. That is what we need the most.

I still feel that if we sign Dansby, and a WR maybe Austin, maybe even someone like Bryant, and draft McClain in the first, and then Cam Thomas with the 43rd pick, we would be sitting pretty for many, many years. Ahhh, i better pinch myself, cause i know i’m dreaming…it is almost bed time.

But isn’t he already more accomplished than what we have? With the exception of Bess, who i think will catch 70 balls this year, we are very inconsistent, and dangerously thin at the position…as if you needed me to inform you of that…LOL

Good debate/discussion. Going to bed, crazy ass day anticipated at work tomorow…keep it going. I will check back tomorrow…PEACE

Now that he finally developed into a #1 WR they’re going to trade him for a half pint RB who’s afraid of contact when they already have Sproles, hahaha c’mon bro, Rivers is the man down there remember, getting rid of your #1 WR is not the way, lol.

this would be a done deal. But as it is I have a better chance of winning the lotto than this taking place.

Our First for their first, second, fourth, and fifth. Hey we would be getting practically raped according to the draft value chart. Maybe they’d go with their first, second, and third instead.

Won’t happen but its fun to dream. Personally, if they agreed to either proposal I jump on it without even blinking.