Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

Patrick Turner: The diamond is worth the rough

It's been a while since the last time I've taken the time to analyze one of our lesser-known or under-proven players in a way hopefully nobody else has. In doing so, I hope to broaden our perspectives and spark debate on a player some Miami fans now see as an after-thought.

You might recall my defending the selection of Patrick Turner, the 6'5", 220 lb. receiver out of the University of Southern California. I likened him to former great possession-receiver Orande Gadsden in a rather long comparison of a few various players (this won't be quite as long, but still lengthy), and as of today, he's far from panning out. I haven't stepped back from that defense, however, and I won't now. Why?

Star-divide

Malcolm Floyd, Miles Austin, and Vincent Jackson tell me not to.

Case No. 1: Malcolm Floyd

The 6'5", 225 lb. undrafted free agent out of Wyoming (preceded by River City High School, now how bad-ass is that?) bears the closest resemblance (body structure-wise) to our very own Patty T. Some of Floyd's pre-draft measurables (he wasn't invited to the 2004 NFL Combine) were as follows: 4.44s-40, 4.18s-20 (shuttle), and a 38 in (96.5 cm) vertical. How does this match up to Turner's combine results? Turner ran a 4.59s-40, 4.20s-20, and had a 34.5 in vertical on his Pro Day. Turner is not as fast as Floyd, though they're nearly identical in size, but he matches up well in the 20 yard shuttle and jumps only a few inches shorter than Floyd.

Though Turner isn't as "athletic" as Floyd given the other similarities between them, Turner played well in college and had a "break-out" his senior year. That season, along with his measurables, were enough for Miami to take him in the third round in 2009.

What has Floyd done in the NFL? With QB Drew Brees throwing to him, Malcolm spent the first year adapting to the speed of the NFL to the tune of 3 catches for 49 yards and a score. All of that production came in the final game of the season, Week 17, though he "played" in four games. Two years later (he missed a year, injury?) was more promising with 15 receptions for 210 yards and three times across the goal line. Then, another year of production-less games: 7 balls caught for 97 yards and no scores over six games. He vastly improved last year with 27 catches for 465 yards and four TDs, and is having his break-out season this year with Chris Chambers finally gone. In 13 games, Floyd has caught another 29 balls for 518 yards and a score. His past four has been more impressive, hauling in 13 passes for 193 yards. Now that he's starting, he's beginning to display why he was a MWC honorable mention his senior season.

Case No. 2: Miles Austin

Another undrafted free agent, this one out of Monmouth (the curse of Monmouth strikes John Nalbone?). Miles and Miles Austin is a 6'3", 214 lb. wideout who also had little-to-no production in his initial season. As a matter of fact, nevermind the little-to part. He had none while being active in nine games. Austin ran both a 4.51s- and a 4.52s-40 in the combine back in 2006, ran a 4.14s 20-yard shuttle, had a 40.5 in vertical, but wasn't taken by any team until after each of the seven draft rounds ended. Then, the Cowboys saw something in him.

This is my strongest case by far: remember what team Jeff Ireland was Vice President of College and Pro Scouting with while Austin was plucked off the UDFA list? Dallas. We see comparisons in Turner's size and athleticism with Austin as well, and once again, Turner has the pedigree over Austin here. Let's see what Miles did at the start of his NFL career and what he's doing now:

As I stated, no catches for Miles in 2006 wihle being active for nine games. The following season, five catches for 76 yards over a full 16-game season. Last season, he caught 13 passes for 278 yards and three scores over a 12-game span. Then, something interesting happened.

Dallas was reportedly willing to tender the highest offer to Austin in order to keep him from leaving as a restricted free agent at the end of the season. I'm sure a lot of you remember the interest we showed in the receiver we all knew had the potential to shine. Did anybody see that potential after his first, useless season? Most people outside of Dallas insiders probably knew too little to have any positive attitude about him. Well, guess what: Terrell Owens is gone, and Roy Williams is not the receiver his trade price made him out to be. Not only that, but injuries strike every team and Miles Austin never let go of his starting opportunity.

Austin is exactly one yard away from his very first 1,000 yard season in this, his fourth season in the league. He also caught his tenth score after last week's game, and appears to be downright dominant. He is THE number one receiver in Dallas. He's Tony's new favorite receiver (nevermind Jason Witten, sorry buddy--I own you in my fantasy league, too), and he will thrive as long as he's in this system with this quarterback for a long time.

Case No. 3: Vincent Jackson

This is the best comparison with Patrick Turner from a body size and pedigree standpoint, and is the receiver I hope to see Patrick become when he's ready. Vincent stands a tall 6'5" and weighs 230 lbs., much like our man. Jackson was drafted out of Northern Colorado in 2005, a second round selection because of his production, talent, and measurables. Sound familiar? If only Jackson went to a big-name (major) school, this comparison would be nearly identical.

Jackson attended the 2005 combine, posting a 4.46s-40 and a 39 in vertical. Once again, more athletic than Patrick, but not by that wide of a margin. Otherwise, similar numbers. Jackson didn't truly begin to produce until Brees left and now-superstar QB Philip Rivers took over, but that was also his sophomore season. As is the trend with these three behemoths, VJ did squat in his rookie season. Well, unless you consider three catches for 59 yards over eight active games "something". With Rivers starting, Jackson stepped it up, posting 27 receptions for 453 yards and six times across the goal line. His "junior" season was one many expected to be his huge break-out season. Instead, many were disappointed by a mere 41 catches for 623 yards. Though it was progression (although he regressed to three scores), he was starting to look like a "bust" in terms of the potential people expected him to reach. He was appearing to be just another mediocre receiver drafted too early.

Then, things clicked within himself and between he and Rivers last season. 59 catches, 1,098 yards and seven 6-pointers later, Jackson was no longer under-achieving. He had arrived. This season is more of the same, as he is one catch away from eclipsing his career-high of 59 receptions set in 2008. He's also on pace for over 1,200 yards receiving.

What has me even more excited (or, I should say, less pessimistic about Turner's lack of ability to see the field in just his first season)? Jackson's YAC is a mere 3.0 career (3.6 last season, 2.6 this year) which tells me that he catches the ball and doesn't have the speed or power/moves to get away from tacklers after that happens. Who's still terribly worried about Turner getting jammed at the line or his inability to use burst to elude tacklers after the catch? Not me. Such performance out of Jackson is promising for what we know we have in Turner in terms of his strengths, weaknesses, and overall level of athleticism.

So, now what?

That rough might be years deep, but if situations similar to the aforementioned three break-out receivers tell us anything, a couple of years of waiting and development would be far more prudent than one year's worth of frustration leading to disownment. Or, worse, being cut. Even if he turns out to be a Malcom Floyd type, he'll be a receiver worth keeping for a handful of years and ultimately worth playing on the field.

Yes, these three players don't play the same way. They did, however, face similar situations and saw almost identical beginnings to their careers. Don't worry about his being inactive on game day quite yet; he isn't a bust. Consider this his redshirt season, and allow him to progress to the level where he does become a factor on Sundays (even if that's Malcolm Floyd-esque production and not Austin/Jackson). The speed of the NFL is far different from that in college, and Turner does have the skill, talent, ability, whatever you want to call it, to thrive in this league.

Remember, Chad Henne is still working on his consistency and developing his deep ball accuracy. Don't give up on this kid just yet.

This fanpost was written by one of The Phinsider's registered users.

Comment 49 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Exactly

This is how I felt when I read some comments in the “Ginn odd man out?” post. Honestly, the only reason Ginn has value is his kick return abilities. Even though none of our receivers are great, I would have a hard time cutting any of them.

by mikey2380 on Dec 14, 2009 9:24 PM EST reply actions  

Sparano said....

that Pat Turner was doing a good job in practice and would see playing time “soon”. I think the hesitation to activate him has to do with the fact that the Dolphins are in Playoff Contention. If we were completely out of it and our offense wasn’t clicking, Pat T would be in the games in a heart beat. Right now Hartline, Camarillo, Bess, and Ginn have developed chemistry with HENNE and it would be FOOLISH to change that up with 3 games left to go.

by Phin-Phan-Phorever on Dec 15, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Fantastic write-up

I have had many discussions about Patrick Turner, and while others have simply decided that he is a draft bust, I have refused to make this claim. As you mentioned, there is a significant difference between college and the NFL and too often we forget that. We all spend so much time discussing and debating these players before and after the draft that we forget that they are really just kids who still have a lot to learn before they can use all those measurables we are so quick to mention in any real way. I commend you on your hard work and astute analysis. I most definitely rec’d it.

by AAH825 on Dec 14, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you sir

Glad you liked it

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 14, 2009 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

rec'd

nice work, this really opens some eyes as to what the expectations for Turner should be. I think a lot of the frustration stems from our WR’s not being very productive, and this offense looking like 1 WR short of being dangerous. We saw potential in Turner at USC, and in the preseason, and I think we all hoped he would fill that void at WR. The fact that he’s been unable to get on the field despite our desperation for a big target has led to some pissed off fans whenever Turner is mentioned. I hope that we keep him, but I also hope that we go out and get a “true #1” in the offseason. I think it comes down to Ginn or Camarillo for that last spot if we keep Turner and add a star. I wish we would keep 6, but I don’t know where the extra roster spot would come from (perhaps cut Dotson, since we are so stout at DE?).

Either way, good write-up, makes me hopeful that Turner can turn into (no pun intended) the guy I hoped he would when we picked him.

Phinsider HOF C/O 2009
Winner of Four 2008/2009 Matty Awards
LN21 and MHTD - Goin Commando
I got dibs

by Little Nicky 21 on Dec 14, 2009 11:22 PM EST reply actions  

Appreciate it Nicky

I agree, I also want that “No. 1” but would hope to see Turner develop into that Gadsden-type when this team is at its peak. Imagine a top receiver with a developed Turner as that huge red-zone threat alongside him, with perhaps Ginn remaining on the roster as the speed threat/return specialist. I still view him as very valuable despite his struggles.

Can’t wait to see how he progresses, because I know he’s not done.

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 14, 2009 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

so an ideal future wr corps

would be: 1: an unknown #1 WR, 2: Bess, 3: Hartline, 4:Camarillo, and 5: Turner? I think we will never (regularly) activate 5 wideouts on gameday, so that seems like future-Turner would find himself in the same situation as present-Turner: usually inactive on gameday.
I kind of feel like if Turner can’t be that true number 1, that is, Vincent Jackson instead of Malcom Floyd, than he is useless to the WR corps as presently constituted (not saying he won’t be that guy, just saying if not). If we were to trade Camarillo than we might have room for a Gadsen-type possession receiver, but no one really wants that.

by Brooklynfinfan on Dec 15, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I was high on the Turner pick and have a nagging suspicion that he might be suffering a fate similar to C. Wake – coaches focusing on their struggles, as opposed to how they can benefit our team. Wake is more dynamic, so they’re almost forced to give him some playing time, but he’s still criminally underutilized.

That said, I think that all of the players listed are a good deal more athletic than Turner. I understand and don’t disagree with what you’re doing, but the WR – with success – who I find most comparable to Turner in terms of size and athletic ability is M. Colston.

We wake & blunder on, / wiser, on the whole, / but not more accurate.

- John Berryman from THE DREAM SONGS #263

by sister_ray on Dec 14, 2009 11:29 PM EST reply actions  

I would agree with that assessment

And like I said, he loses out on athleticism to these guys for the most part. He isn’t terribly far, however.

If he could develop into a Colston type too, that would be something. I just don’t think it’s fair or correct to be this harsh on the kid when this is just the norm for players who need to catch up to the speed of the NFL.

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 14, 2009 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitely

Good write up, too – forgot to say that.

But, I think the kid has tons of potential, and I’m not down on him at all. Let’s hope we’re right.

We wake & blunder on, / wiser, on the whole, / but not more accurate.

- John Berryman from THE DREAM SONGS #263

by sister_ray on Dec 14, 2009 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he's going to be great for us AFTER...

he builds some chemistry with HENNE in training camp after he’s spent a year learning the new system etc. We can’t afford to make any drastic changes in our WR core while still in PLAYOFF CONTENTION unless a WR gets INJURED. Otherwise he needs to sit back and learn and soon he will be ready. I still would like to see the Phins use him on fade routes to the corner of the endzone!

by Phin-Phan-Phorever on Dec 15, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a very key point. Snaps in training camp with Henne predominantly under center.

That’s where the chemistry will develop and it’s that training camp next year that tells us whether Patrick Turner stays or goes.

and the dragfly aint a beer. on the flip! - Finsxfactor's tribute to Wild Zion Beaver
23 Phinsider Feud Points!
3 WW points!

by kdock on Dec 15, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Great write up man how long did it take to complete it? prbrably a long time

Turner will be special one day and hopefully he will be with the dolphins when he does become special

Chillin in the Henne ERA!!!!
DRAFT GOLDEN TATE BANDWAGON!!!
Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein."
(Norman? Is he related to Albert? I guess we know who isn't a genius.)

by DPL3 Rollin on Dec 14, 2009 11:57 PM EST reply actions  

I hate to turn this into a Ginn thread,

but doesn’t this kind of justify keeping Ginn around for a 4th season? If all these receivers are breaking out in their 4th+ seasons, why not Ginn? He’s had much more production than any of these other receivers in his first years.

Driver of the Make David Lee OC Bandwagon
Repentant Former Driver of the Trade-Ronnie-Brown Bandwagon.

by joel311 on Dec 15, 2009 1:08 AM EST reply actions  

Oh believe me

I am an advocate of keeping Ted Ginn on our roster.

Even if we turn him into a return specialist and he sees the field on a very limited basis as a pure receiver, he’s a weapon and we need to use him as such even when we find our “No. 1”.

His end-arounds.. his kick returns.. he’s too valuable to let go if we can retain him for the right price.

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 15, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Let me ask you this. Do you think we need a legit #1 WR with our 1st or 2nd pick in the 2010 draft?

and the dragfly aint a beer. on the flip! - Finsxfactor's tribute to Wild Zion Beaver
23 Phinsider Feud Points!
3 WW points!

by kdock on Dec 15, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I absolutely do.

But I’d rather get a proven one. We are a contender by 2011 at the latest. A serious contender.

In that time, we need a dominant ILB alongside Crowder, and one (if not two) new high-pedigree, hight-talent pass-rushing OLBs. I suspect we go for both in the draft (unless we can get our hands on Karlos Dansby this offseason), and with high picks. I also have a feeling we start to draft a running back fairly high (2nd-4th) and offensive linemen around then as well.

I don’t see Bill Parcells spending a first rounder on a wide receiver, and I don’t know that I want to wait for a second round WR to develop soon enough. I know we won’t go after a big name established vet, so I think we need to and should use something like a second rounder on that type of guy.

By no means do I think Turner will be a go-to or produce enough for us to forget about going after a guy like that.

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 15, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we might get one in the Free Agency market after all. Ireland has eluded to this in the recent past.

Ultimately, however, Uncle Bill has the final say-so. I hope he goes against his career long tendencies and goes after an Anquan Boldin or a Vincent jackson.

and the dragfly aint a beer. on the flip! - Finsxfactor's tribute to Wild Zion Beaver
23 Phinsider Feud Points!
3 WW points!
26 Player Pick 'em Points!

by kdock on Dec 15, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I love his end-arounds.

nohomo.

I was livid when I saw Bess doing an end-around against Jax. What kind of crack does Dan Henning smoke?

Driver of the Make David Lee OC Bandwagon
Repentant Former Driver of the Trade-Ronnie-Brown Bandwagon.

by joel311 on Dec 15, 2009 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, great write up.

I’ve been clamoring to see Patrick on the field at least once before the season is over. I don’t want to go into another Draft never having seen him.

Driver of the Make David Lee OC Bandwagon
Repentant Former Driver of the Trade-Ronnie-Brown Bandwagon.

by joel311 on Dec 15, 2009 1:09 AM EST reply actions  

Great write up .. Rec'd

great insight on WR and there development … I really hope all the best for Turner and if this is the case I would be jumping for joy.

I personally would have a hard time seeing any of these WR not being on the team but to be honest I had a hard time even letting Brandon London go so that is why I am the fan and not the GM.

W.E. the trifecta decides to do with the WR group I’m sure it won’t be a knee jerk reaction and will benefit the club in the long term

by markus_13 on Dec 15, 2009 3:21 AM EST reply actions  

I am in the same boat as you.

Even though I knew deep down that Brandon London wouldn’t make the roster, I was too fond of the kid to accept the fact.

Driver of the Make David Lee OC Bandwagon
Repentant Former Driver of the Trade-Ronnie-Brown Bandwagon.

by joel311 on Dec 15, 2009 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the write up

I’ve been wanting to air out the Pat Turner subject lately and you delivered. Really hoping that PT is progressing in practice and NOT going the S.Murphy route. The only thing with the measurables is his vertical jump. Your other examples all hover right around 39" with Patty down a few inches. The jump ball seems to be what this type of WR lives on.

by Red Dog on Dec 15, 2009 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, that's a touch worrisome

But his arm span is much longer than the average corner’s, so having such a tall receiver with a shorter vert isn’t a killer to me.

But what do I know haha

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 15, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

That's a good point.

His arms are already 3 inches higher off the ground!

Driver of the Make David Lee OC Bandwagon
Repentant Former Driver of the Trade-Ronnie-Brown Bandwagon.

by joel311 on Dec 15, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Couldn't disagree more with your assessment of his measurables

To say that Turner’s not the “athlete” that the other receivers are is an understatement. The 40 yd dash measures pure speed. The cone drill measures quickness. The vertical jump measures explosiveness. In all three aspects Turner falls well short of the other guys. Floyd is considerably faster than Turner which gives him separation skills that Turner won’t possess. Miles is considerably quicker and more explosive than Turner which will make him a better route runner, meaning he will get open more easily. Jackson is considerable faster and more explosive than Turner.

Also, Floyd and Miles were undrafted free agents. You can let those guys develop. Turner is a 3rd round draft pick who should be contributing right now, especially considering how poor the overall corp of receivers miami has right now. Even Jackson in his 1st year, learning the speed of the nfl game, was still active for 8 games. Will Turner be active at all this year? Will he see the field and contribute in any meaningful way?

To borrow a phrase from Denny Green: “Turner is exactly who we thought he was!” The draft experts said he was slow, not quick, doesn’t create separation and and didn’t run routes well. And from everything that I have read to this point, that is exactly what he is. That is why he was projected as a 6th or 7th round draft pick.

If Turner had any of the measurables that would put him in the ballpark with those guys you mentioned above, I would say give him a chance to grow. But he doesn’t. He is an average at best athletically. He is a poor man’s Mike Williams (from the same college) without Williams college productivity. How did he turn out as an NFL player?

Nice Write-Up. Rec’d.

by ct1361 on Dec 15, 2009 12:43 PM EST reply actions  

Glad to see some disagreement

He didn’t run routes well, and his relative lack of athleticism hinders him from creating that separation. True points.

But then again, how quick or fast was Orande Gadsden? We don’t even need Turner to become the next Miles Austin or the next Vincent Jackson. Hell, if he could catch a handful of balls for 700-800 yards at his peak, that’s worth the pick to me. What makes me still feel good about him is that he can work on his route running, improve his route depth. Why else would he be kept out? The speed of the game is one thing, but Karl Dorrell spends time with Ginn and Bess and Hartline even still, getting their routes and timing to where they need to be in order to develop those players. If Turner could run routes properly, even without extreme athleticism, he will still be able to contribute in a year or two.

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 15, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

See Both Points

There is clearly something there that makes him worthy to be in the NFL. I think as fans we hope that he develops and becomes that tall dominating end zone threat we all want in Miami. But he quite possibily be a huge bust. This off-season will say a lot about him and his development.

As for the points:
Seperation can not be learned, however seperation is something deep threat (WR) need to get open, if you can run routes well then seperation does not play as big of a factor.

Route Running can be taught and yes quickness is needed in some parts, a 6’5 WR like Turner, Jackson and Floyd are not quick. Their success will come from routes not needed to be quick on, such as: come backs where you wait for the DB to turn his hips, or post, digs or outs where they can use their long body and size to out position DB’s.

These points are moot unless Turner can learn to play at the NFL level. He was always the best WR on the field and did not have to try much in College, but now playing against the best of the best he has some learing to do.

And please oh please do not use “draft experts” as a point to say he will not be good. I only use Mayock or Keiper to show me clips and explain players I had no clue about. They have no clue how a player is going to develop in the pros or college work to translate to his pro game.

Tom Brady had very little arm strength and strugled with accuracy…. Robert Gallery was suppose to be the next coming at OL, Troy Williamson was a fast and amazing deep threat…. the list goes on and on.

The Patriots Suck

by k2oconnor on Dec 15, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Draft Experts ....

for the most part are pretty good. Are there misses? Of course. But most of the information that they use on air are from paid scouts from NFL teams and those should be taken seriously.

I hope Turner succeeds, I really do. But everything that I have read about Turner since the draft have echoed the concerns by the draft experts on draft day. That tells me that they were right.

by ct1361 on Dec 15, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

....

Can’t base anything is players first year. 3-4 years then you can tell. All I am saying is I never trust “Draft Experts” or what they say. They provide facts, and for McShay and Keiper who never played football or coached football have no better idea then you or I on how a player is to develop. As I said I use them on little known players to just find out more about them, but they ramble nonsense sometimes. They state the obvious and are wrong many times, but by the time 3-4 years has gone by people forget what was said about the players and all is forgotten.

Your better off developing your own opinions and knowledge of a player by studying your own game tape.

The Patriots Suck

by k2oconnor on Dec 15, 2009 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with ct1361

Plus Hartline has been good. Hartline has been good; he is everything that Turner was supposed to be in 1 year not 4. Turner better shape up fast or be ready to be somewhere else. Nice write up though.

"If anything goes bad, I did it. If anything goes semi-good, we did it. If anything goes really good you did it. That's all it takes to get people to win football games for you."

Coach Paul Bear Bryant

by AussieKen on Dec 16, 2009 12:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly what I was going to say.

I do think Turner has some potential, but until we get him on the field how will we know? Practice can only show you so much.

by luvs2drnk on Dec 16, 2009 7:31 AM EST up reply actions  

No one's a bust until they’re cut.

As maligned as this unit has been, the one’s who are suiting up are producing.

It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. ~ John Wooden

by paulymcmac on Dec 15, 2009 2:08 PM EST reply actions  

Good Post

But one thing that you are leaving out is probably the most important: attitude. I don’t know what kind of attitude Patrick Turner has, but maybe he doesn’t have the same work ethic and coachability that some of these other guys have. I’m not saying he doesn’t, but we just don’t know. USC doesn’t exactly have a track record of turning out WR’s with great attitudes, i.e. Dwayne Jarrett and Mike Williams. Just food for thought….

by jjschmid72 on Dec 15, 2009 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you for bringing that up

And that is something I documented in my last article concerning Turner and comparing him against Mike Williams, the true USC bust.

I found multiple sources crediting Turner with far more of a work ethic than Williams, and I don’t see BP using up a third round pick on a guy that has documented coachability issues. He “just says no” to those types before even giving them a thought.

If you would like a link that last article I wrote about PT, I’d be happy to link you..

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 15, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Attitude

From the reports on him in Training camp is that he has a great work ethic, when things are going well, and poor one when things are not. When he was praised for catching every ball and really shining he continue to do well, and handle himself well. But I remember reading a few reports that he was slouching around after a coupled of drop balls and criticism from reporters. This resulted in poor practices.

So how he handles adversity is something to look for. If he stays positive it could work out, but if he is down about it he could become damaged goods.

The Patriots Suck

by k2oconnor on Dec 15, 2009 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

That's worrisome

I would consider not really sniffing the field for the entire season to be adversity. If he doesn’t handle it well, he better figure it out quick, or it will snowball him down the depth chart.

Dave,
I do agree that BP does not draft guys with a history of questionable work ethic , and I hope Turner pans out. Some players are late bloomers, and Vincent Jackson is a great example. I have said all year he is the most underrated receiver in the league.

by jjschmid72 on Dec 16, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Sad but true, too many people give up on players too quickly,

and I agree 100% we shouldn’t give up on Turner, I’d like to see him get in some games, but as ct1361 pointed out, all these guys have better “physical tools” then he does, I like your Oronde comparisons more, but Turner has been knocked for not playing to his physicality, if he can learn to use his body as a shield he can be like Keyshawn, without the miserable attitude he had, lol.

Great write up.

by uncle finster on Dec 15, 2009 3:17 PM EST reply actions  

And all but one of those guys is an upcoming free agent

good read BTW

Current Phinsider Feud Points: 23

T.Lex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt. Can't just suppress sixty five million years of gut instinct.

by Patssuck456 on Dec 15, 2009 5:45 PM EST reply actions  

What I heard from Sparano ...

If I heard him right he basically said that Hartline had bee activated because he could play special teams and Turner is really too tall to play on special teams. I think people are reading way too much into him not being activated to this point. It sounds like he has to be a starter before Sparano is willing to activate him, because he doesn’t have any value as a special teamer. If so… chill out people. Wait until we actually see him on the field. I think they will throw him in there definately by next season if not near the end of this season.

by Jason Scott_90 on Dec 15, 2009 8:51 PM EST reply actions  

You had me

and you lost me. Too tall for special teams???? I know Hartline wqas activated realy on in lieu of Turner because of his special teams play, but I doubt Sparano ever aid Turner was too tall for special teams. didn’t Brandon London play special teams all last year at 6’4" or so?

by jjschmid72 on Dec 16, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry for the typos - I typed fast and didn't preview it first. I promise I'm literate!

and you lost me. Too tall for special teams???? I know Hartline was activated early on in lieu of Turner because of his special teams play, but I doubt Sparano ever said Turner was too tall for special teams. Didn’t Brandon London play special teams all last year at 6’4" or so?

by jjschmid72 on Dec 16, 2009 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

well, he has been active

for one or two games, including Carolina, but didn’t play. My take? he’s neither quick enough nor polished enough to get open. The special teams bit is just Sparano doing his coach smokescreen thing.

by Brooklynfinfan on Dec 16, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

great job man, rec'd.

it is ball-busting to think that we have such a huge wide reciever riding pine. but hopefully you are right, and it will all pan out. I know henne would like to have a guy who can win those jump balls.

2009 is a year of respect ladies and gentlemen. Lets get it.

"i think we have to look at it through his shoes" tuscanitunr talkin about brett farve.

13 1/2 phinsider fued points!!!

by MrMedic on Dec 16, 2009 3:41 PM EST reply actions  

Great article. I came over from Music City Miracles to check you guys out and stumbled upon this gem.

I was fortunate enough to see Turner play in high school. He was probably THE best high school player in the state of TN his junior and senior years because his size was just too much for the high school level kids to handle(which I guess is how he ended up at USC) . While at USC, I thought he underperformed, which might be because the Nashville media had talked him up so much and I expected him to produce like Calvin Johnson. Tennessee high schools arent really known for pumping out great high school players and when one is heavily pursued by USC it makes you think he is for real. But he never did really take over a game in college the way he did in high school. I know college isnt high school, but really, this guy TOOK OVER GAMES Randy Moss style, and seeing it in person elevated my expectations of him. With USCs WR track record of late(barring Steve Smith), I understand why many of you are worried that he will be a bust. As much as I want to see him succeed, I too have to admit that its unlikely(IMO). His production has decreased significantly as the level of competition he faced has risen. With his size and hands, it makes me think he should put 20+ lbs on and move to TE. After reading that he isnt a special teamer, I have to consider that maybe he just isnt physical enough for the NFL. I hate to start the whole SEC-PAC10 defense debate, but do you all think he would have produced the same in college had he been in the SEC? Maybe playing in the SEC would have toughened him up for the next level. Who knows. Thats all I got for yall on that.

Furthermore, I would like to say thanks to all who participated in the Ask the Miami Dolphins/Tennessee Titans posts. You guys are class acts, unlike some of the other teams we have had to put up with this year. Heres to a great game today, good luck to you all.

by bull4real on Dec 20, 2009 9:45 AM EST reply actions  

Truly appreciate your kind words

I fully enjoyed both of those posts and was happy to answer a lot of your questions over at your site. I’ve even started to read your other stories and posts and have chimed in on a lot of your opinions with my own. You guys are a bunch of classy people, as well.

I agree with you about Turner. As much as I wanted to spark optimism here, I think his best chance of performing is to put on some weight and increase strength and play as a tight end. I truly hope he’ll turn into a Floyd or better, but I’m not holding my breath. He can’t separate the way he needs to, so unless he turns more physical, he won’t be able to dominate. I’m just hoping he will be able to do that.

Good luck to your side as well, let’s hope for no injuries. A great game indeed!

David A. Fuller, CPA, MST

2009 Unofficial "The Phinsider" (Phinaddict's League) Fantasy Baseball League Champion

by Dave.Phuller on Dec 20, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You knwo I'm willing to be patient with the kid

but at least lets hear ANY sort of news about him. Hell I dont even know what the guy looks like.

by kazam92 on Dec 21, 2009 12:05 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's community dedicated to the only franchise in NFL history to have an undefeated team: the Miami Dolphins!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

101_2268_small
The Airport ; A place for photo-ops and a power meeting ! Part 3
101_2268_small
Bust It Out ! Part 2
101_2268_small
Trippin' in Indy Part 1
Fr8train_small
My Reality Check Rant.......(long)
Fr8train_small
Fr8 Train Rants about OFF4L....because he deserves it.

Recent FanPosts

Dolphins_small
Hollywood's 2012 Offseason
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Default_small
In reallity, we should have won 2-3 SuperBowls Late 80's early 90's
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Small
TE....Problem Solved???
Kermit_pic_small
"Peyton, Peyton, Peyton!"
Small
Is there a reason Don Strock is not being considered for head coach
Rangerjae5_small
Ricky Ran Ricky Ran
12494312a_imagine-john-lennon-posters_small
Football Withdrawal

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Coach

Miamidolphins_small Mosul_DolFan

Coordinators

Lcffsig_small LeftCoastFinFan

Tcp_small texascowpunk

Jake_long_small kmb8488

Assistant Coaches

Kdog_medium_small Kdog92

Dan_marino1_small Finhead83

Appmichigan2_small The Earl

Screen_shot_2012-02-03_at_5 AlejandroN