Jason Taylor: A Hall of Famer?
With all the attention being paid to Michael Strahan over the past 2 days following his announcement that he is retiring, I kind of got to thinking a little bit. Pretty much everyone in the media is declaring that Strahan is a 1st ballot Hall of Famer. And if that is indeed the case, then isn't Jason Taylor also a 1st ballot Hall of Famer?
That's what I wanted to take a closer look at. And the first way to compare the two is statistically. Here's how their career numbers break down:
| Player | Seasons | Tk | Sck | TFL | FF | FR | Int | PD | Blk | Sfty | TD |
| Michael Strahan | 15 | 854 | 141.5 | 84.5 | 24 | 15 | 4 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Jason Taylor | 11 | 654 | 117 | 59.5 | 41 | 26 | 7 | 77 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
As you can see here, Taylor, despite playing in 4 fewer seasons, has better numbers than Strahan in all but 3 categories. However, if you compare single season averages, you'll notice that Taylor averages more tackles per season (59.5 to 57) and more sacks (10.6 to 9.4) than Strahan, and just narrowly trails Strahan in tackles for loss per season (5.6 to 5.4).
Also note that both players have reached double-digit sacks in 6 seasons.
Another thing to look at are the various accolades each player has received. Both have won Defensive Player of the Year awards. Strahan is a 7 time pro-bowler and 4 time All-Pro while Taylor is a 6 time pro-bowler and 3 time All-Pro. Very close, but Strahan has the edge there.
And, of course, Michael Strahan has a Super Bowl ring while Jason Taylor obviously does not (but he does have a 2nd place finish on "DWTS"). But to count the lack of a ring against Taylor is unfair. Football is the ultimate team sport. It's not his fault that his supporting cast was never that good. So it's completely ignorant to say that Strahan is a Hall of Fame player while Taylor is not just because Michael has a ring.
Another way to look at Taylor's Hall of Fame credentials is by examining his place in history. And as it stands now, Taylor ranks 14th on the all-time career sacks list. Strahan, meanwhile, comes in at #5. And since it's likely Taylor will play in 2008 (I won'y ever say it's guaranteed, but it's likely), Jason will likely rise close to the top 10 (10 sacks in '08 would move JT up to 11th). And if Taylor were to play 3 more seasons (including '08), he'd have a very real opportunity to move ahead of Strahan, and to do it in one less season. All Taylor would have to do is average 8 sacks per season over 3 seasons to pull a half of a sack away from Strahan for 5th all-time.
The thing is, however, Taylor doesn't want to play much longer. Taylor even stated that he's unsure if he'll be playing beyond the 2008 season. Therefore, he may have just one more season to prove to the voters that he is indeed a Hall of Fame player. But in my view, he could retire today and be a Hall of Famer - and on the 1st ballot.
The bottom line here is that while Strahan was a great player, he didn't have the impact that Jason Taylor had at times. Taylor is a player who can single-handedly take over football games as a defensive end. Those kinds of players are rare. Strahan, while a great player, did not have that kind of overall effect on his team. I've watched many, many Strahan games and not once do I recall him taking over a game the way Jason Taylor has done in the past.
So if the media wants to already enshrine Michael Strahan into the Hall of Fame, then they better be making some room already for Jason Taylor as well.
Why?
Because Jason Taylor is a better player. Period.
0 recs |
52 comments
Comments
Not sure about first ballot
you have to look at who he’d be competing against, and i think all of these players are ahead of JT:
Brett Favre -obviously
Jonathon Ogden -best franchise LT in a long time
Strahan -bigger stats in the two most important categories for a DE (tackles and sacks) and is also considered a more complete DE because hes better against the run
Warren Sapp -ridiculous stats for a DT
Larry Allen -dominated for a very long time
Bryant Young- I actually think JT would get ahead in ahead of Young only because hes more well known and plays a flashier position, but Youngs stats are close to JT’s in both tackles (620) and sacks (90) and that was as a 3-4 DE/ 4-3 DT, which is a more difficult position to accumulate stats
So from my count, that would be six people JT would have to compete against for one of the 5 spots in the 2013 HOF, and I think JT would fall right around 6th or 7th out of these people. I think he would get in eventually, but not a first ballot HOF if he retires this year.
by dolfanstanley on
Jun 11, 2008 4:47 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The one thing about NFL HOF
It is how you go out of the league. Strahan goes out on a high note. But imagine if he had retired last year….such as in the middle of training camp. We would not even be having this conversation.
Look at Sapp. Yeah ridiculous stats, but being unknown the last 4 years of his career leads me to believe he is not a first or a second ballot hall of famer. He will get in on a down year!
I think if Jason’s attitude does not change, he will not be a Hall of Famer, and definitely not a quick one.
by JGray on
Jun 11, 2008 8:27 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Welld oent that sound familiar?
Football is the ultimate team sport. It’s not his fault that his supporting cast was never that good. So it’s completely ignorant to say that Strahan is a Hall of Fame player while Taylor is not just because Michael has a ringDidnt we have a QB who also faced that argument?
Stan Garino was his name I think
by Patssuck456 on
Jun 11, 2008 9:04 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Touchdown stats
Great comparison and argument but Jason’s TD stats are incorrect here because he actually has 8 career touchdowns. Perhaps the 3 TD’s indicated here are just the interceptions returned for TD, of which he does have 3. However he also has 5 fumbles returned for TD in his career which ties him with former Falcon Jessie Tuggle for the NFL record. Perhaps Strahan’s TD’s only include Interceptions as well. I’m not sure. But Jason has 8 for sure.
In addition, I believe Jason’s 41 forced fumbles puts him 4 behind NFL career record holder Derrik Thomas who had 45.
by RayFinkley on
Jun 11, 2008 9:18 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
There is no comparison!
No comparison of JT to Marino. Marino was the best at his position at the time.
You might have a hard time arguing JT is one of the top ten greatest DEs of all time!
by JGray on
Jun 11, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Marino Best of all time!
I believe if Marino had a good running back like Brown/Williams & a Defense..like the Fins prior to 2007….Dan the MAn would own a couple rings!
by MassFinFan65 on
Jun 11, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ah...
what if… what could have been.
I hate that game.
11
y not if im wrong who will remember
by qbinfin on Apr 27, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
by DolfinPhan on
Jun 13, 2008 11:05 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If JT retires now...
...He’s gonna be just like Tiki Barber, close, but no cigar. He may lead in a lot of the smaller categories, but being behind in the Tackles and Sacks still hurts him, mainly only because he hasn’t played as many seasons.
Now, if he actually played 3 more seasons and kept up his current pace, he’d be a no-brainer first-ballot, otherwise, he’ll get in on a down year.
Some people try to find things in this game that don't exist but football is only two things - blocking and tackling. ~Vince Lombardi
by ratenxs on
Jun 11, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep, those "all but three categories" are important.
Tackles and Sacks are the “bread and butter” of a DE.
-LCFF
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Jun 11, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right
But Taylor averages more per season. Does that count for anything?
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 11:56 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let me turn it around and ask you this:
If he played 5 seasons, with all the same averages per season, should that get him in? How about 7 seasons? How about 4 seasons?
How much should the length of career and overall totals count for?
-LCFF
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Jun 11, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think...
...you raise a good question.
In my view, when you reach double digits in years played, that’s good enough. Also, if Taylor plays this year and picks up another 10 or 11 sacks, that means he’ll be averaging more sacks than Strahan and will only have 3 less seasons played than Michael. 15 seasons to 12 seasons isn’t really that big of a difference, is it?
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Averages don't really come into play as much.
Because think about it, if a player came in his rookie season and absolutely exploded, racking up more then 100 tackles and more then 10 sacks in his first season, then retired, would he be a Hall of Famer?
So much of the selection process focuses around where the player ranks on the “all-time” lists. All-time yardage, all-time tackles, all-time sacks, things like that. (Of course, now that I look at it, I can see that JT is #14 on the all-time sacks list, and only 2 people ahead of him are actually in the HOF…..). IF he quits now, I think he comes up just short of being a first-ballot guy. Will he get in eventually? Absolutely, just not on the first ballot.
Some people try to find things in this game that don't exist but football is only two things - blocking and tackling. ~Vince Lombardi
by ratenxs on
Jun 11, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lefty...
that’s a really good point, but the NFL shows that there isn’t a clear-cut number.
For instance, TD – Terrell Davis was a HOF semi-finalist in his first year of eligibility, despite only 4 full seasons ( yes I know he had 7 total, but was injured for most of 3 of those).
Then again, TD had a 4.8 ypc/average and more rushing yards in his first four (healthy) seasons than anyone ever save for Earl Campbell and Dickerson.
Will he get in? Who knows, but he’s in the running again, despite just 4 full seasons.
Jim Brown only played 9 years, but he certainly got in.
Bledsoe & Testaverde will have played over 30 seasons combined but neither will get in.
My point is you have to weigh all aspects,, including a player’s performance and longevity. If they are dominate enough, then a shorter career will still get them in.
I think at 10 years, JT has already met the longevity ‘metric’ given his level of performance.
To me, he get’s in, maybe not first ballot (depends on that year’s class) but he gets in.
by Natalya on
Jun 11, 2008 6:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hall of Very Good
JT seems like a great guy (until the last 6 months), but to say he’s a first ballot or “sure” HOF is a stretch by Dolfans who can’t see the big picture. For all the sack stats he has, I guess no one can remember that for the first 6-7 years of his career, he was terrible at the run and he and Zack had a real knack for coming up very small in the big games. Just remember all the Bills games when he would get pancaked, or the infamous Jets and Patriots defensive choke-jobs. For that reason, I would think he MIGHT get in, but wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t.
If Andre Reed hasn’t gotten in, and he was clearly one of the top 3-4 receivers in the 1990’s, how can you say JT is a lock? Strahan always had a more all-around game (ie run defense), and, face it, he played in NYC.
by BILLSRULE on
Jun 11, 2008 11:12 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
So what I'm getting from this is...
...even though Taylor has more tackles and more sacks per season, he misses the Hall while Strahan is a shoe-in because Strahan played longer. Is this accurate?
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree....
with that general sentiment but, and this is key, knowing how the hall works, strahan could be a first-ballot guy while JT probably isn’t.
Strahan, like JT, is a personable, smart guy who has a quick wit also. Let’s not discount how much that counts for.
The biggest difference though, aside from Strahan playing a few more seasons, is this…
Strahan helped lead a team to a SB winner against an unprecedented, 18-0 opponent. Everyone will remember that. Strahan also played on much better teams than JT, so again, people recall that fact.
Put that aside and go strictly off of what they’ve done on the field and I think these two are pretty even.
by Natalya on
Jun 11, 2008 11:29 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
And also, let’s not understate the longevity thing. Longevity is a pretty big thing as far as how great a player’s contribution is to his team and how much he impacts the public’s memory and imagination. Imagine Marino only playing 6 or 7 years. Would he still be a Hof Famer? Maybe not.
by icerob on
Jun 11, 2008 11:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well it's not like he's retiring because he can't play anymore...
...it’s because he’s an idiot hoping to make it in Hollywood. There’s certainly a difference.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 11:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OK
I was beginning to think you were turning Pro-JT again for a minute, Matty. I say he’ll make the Hall based on his current accomplishments and recognition. We’re all a litlle pissy about him right now but he is a stand up player and I think his clean cut character/image will help.
mophins
by mophins on
Jun 11, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
image
He does have a Man of the Year award, too. That has to count for something, right?
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 12:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He also has that commercial for the ASCPA (against animal cruelty or something of another) with his really ugly dog Bear:
http://www.aspca.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cruelty_nflpsa
11
y not if im wrong who will remember
by qbinfin on Apr 27, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
by DolfinPhan on
Jun 13, 2008 11:12 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldn't say he misses it...
but, yeah Matty, it makes a difference.
-LCFF
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Jun 11, 2008 11:39 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
JT will eventually be a HOF, but if he doesn’t win a Championship he won be a first ballot HOF’er. Strahan has locked in his first ballot by winning a SB. I also don’t see JT playing 4 more years, so I don’t see him closing in on the sacks, which lets face it, is where DLinemen get their recognition and earn their HOF status.
by feelthepain on
Jun 11, 2008 11:58 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Why do you..
guys CARE about the HOF ballot of JT, if he doesn’t care about it. I could care less about him been in the HOF or not.
I will see the Dolphins win a SUPER BOWL before i die(20 years and counting)
by Aleta on
Jun 11, 2008 12:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It's an interesting question Matty...
And I think JT eventually gets in, but probably not a first ballot.
And I don’t think the SB ring is as important a deciding factor for a DL as opposed to say a QB.
The Jayfiss Report ...one fan's rants
by NumberSeven on
Jun 11, 2008 12:16 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think one of the points being missed here...
..is that Taylor’s impact goes beyond just statistics. Can anyone honestly tell me that Taylor didn’t have more of an impact in each game than Strahan? Jason can take over games the way no defensive end of his time (outside of Reggie White) can. Strahan never really made that much if an impact game in and game out, in my view. And trust me, I’ve seen a ton of Giants games.
Also, here are some quotes from an SI.com article from last June:
“I’ve never competed against anybody any tougher and smarter,” says New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, Taylor’s good friend and, in a 21-0 Pats loss in Miami last December, the primary target of Taylor’s laser dot. “JT changes every game that he plays in.”
“He took over games,” says coach Jeff Fisher, whose Tennessee Titans lost to the Dolphins 13-10 last September. “I don’t feel there’s been a player in our league the last few years who’s had an impact on games, who people had to concern themselves with so thoroughly, the way Jason did last year.”
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not first ballot if he retires next year
Longevity has another phase to it – still excelling, even at an advanced age.
Taylor may average more stats now, but in 4 years will his body still be able to keep up with his present stats? It seems we’ll never know.
I’d like to compare Strahan through 4 less years to Taylor now. Was Strahan a Hall of Famer then? Were their stats so dissimilar then?
-kmonty
-BroncoTalk.net
by kmonty on
Jun 11, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Through 11 seasons...
...Strahan would have 642 tackles, 114 sacks, and 57 tackles for loss. Taylor would be ahead in all categories.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 2:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
That is interesting. But would you say Strahan was a Hall of Famer then?
It’s arguable. Which is why, if Taylor retired in 2009, I don’t think he’d be first ballot, but would get in after a few years.
-kmonty
-BroncoTalk.net
by kmonty on
Jun 11, 2008 3:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can say it!
I can honestly say, Taylor didn’t have more of an impact in each game than Strahan.
I can honestly say, Taylor is no where near Reggie White.
An impact player helps impact the team to WIN games!
by JGray on
Jun 11, 2008 2:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's not fair
Again, surrounding talent.
Teams game-planned around trying to stop Taylor. He’d face double and even triple teams at times. There’s only so much a DE can do to help win games.
But no DE since 2000 has made more of an impact than Taylor. The stats say it (most sacks since 2000) and other players and coaches say it.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 2:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's the ring
It’s the same reason Kirby Puckett is in the Hall of Fame and Don Mattingly is not. Puckett won a championship and Mattingly didnt.
by Gatorfan4114 on
Jun 11, 2008 3:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
let's not even get into that...
...because that’s such an injustice. And I hate the Yankees.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 3:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
JT
I thought the talent was pretty good in the early 2000s. I also don’t think the Giants had that much talent this past year….(Yeah they look good now)
Teams game planned around the other great DEs too.
Listen, I am not a JT hater. My dogs name is Zach and my cats name is JT. (I also had a snake named Nick, but thats a story for another day). But if JT comes back and dedicates the next 2-3 years he will be what everyone thinks he is now! I think we have had talent and have had poor leadership in the FO, Coaching Staff and in the locker room. And I can only push that through to our supposed leader JT.
The NFL HOF is fraternity that I do not believe JT is eligible for yet. And i would also think that the other NFLers who are in see that as well. Look at the list on the HOF website for DEs. All great ones. Most won the big game, or at least played in one. Jack Youngblood didn’t win, but played in one. Leroy Selmon, didn’t play, but was so well respected among hi peers. I don’t think JT has that respect….yet.
by JGray on
Jun 11, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Do you have a Dolphin named Snowflake?
11
y not if im wrong who will remember
by qbinfin on Apr 27, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
by DolfinPhan on
Jun 13, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Matty Salguero?
Matty, when you cross out something and write something else, you seem like a total weasel Armando Salguero. Don’t go there!
Seriously, JT is not an idiot for hoping to make it in Hollywood. If I looked like him and had those opportunities, I’d be pretty intrigued too. Wouldn’t you?
Nice to hear you defend his on-field contributions, though. Great analysis.
by ZIM on
Jun 11, 2008 3:16 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He's an idiot...
...because instead of sticking around for 3 or 4 years (which by then Miami should be contenders) and trying to prove he’s among the greatest of all time, he wants to go make movies. He’s supposed to be a professional athlete. He should care about his status among the game’s all-time greats, in my honest opinion.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s a valid point as well. Not saying he should play for stats, but wins, it doesn’t hurt at this point in his career when a Championship is not close to make his mark on this game by trying to get into the HOF.
11
y not if im wrong who will remember
by qbinfin on Apr 27, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
by DolfinPhan on
Jun 13, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fair enough
But I think it’s odd to say what other people should care about. This is why so many people can’t stand Ricky Williams – because he looks at things differently than most of us. It’s one thing if you lie like Nick Saban and quite another if you just choose to end your career on your own terms. Was Barry Sanders an idiot, too? Jim Brown? They seem pretty happy to me.
by ZIM on
Jun 11, 2008 3:29 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Barry Sanders was miserable because he with a perennial loser in the Lions organization/front office (hence his early retirement). And he was a game changer!
11
y not if im wrong who will remember
by qbinfin on Apr 27, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
by DolfinPhan on
Jun 13, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How do you know
that taylor isnt a HOFer? He has not even retired. So this talk is quite premature at the moment. Lets take a deep breath and relax until JT does retire. He most likely is going to be wearing that ugly gold jacket, but te question right now is he a first ballot or not.
by broncfanstuckinsd on
Jun 11, 2008 3:44 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He IS an idiot
because i think the Phins could be at least a playoff team within 2 years. (don’t ruin my vision here) But at the same time it’s a lot easier for us to say he should play several more years from behind our keyboards. I am a former athlete – baseball and wrestling in high school. Now obviously not at anywhere near this kind of level but my point is the same. I couldn’t go on to college sports because my body wouldn’t allow it. I’m 33 and have pain every day. Who knows what JT’s feeling every day. What I’m saying is it could be understandable to not want to play until his body gives out on him. JT has stayed away from major injuries but who knows how many annoying aches and pains he has from the abuse he is putting himself through. I certainly wasn’t taking on 300lb lineman like JT is. If he’s dealing with his body telling him he should only play another year then I’m ok with that. Maybe he just isn’t wanting to risk a major injury that could affect his life after football co-staring with The Rock. I don’t like that but I can appreciate it. Here’s a scenario for you…....JT plays with the Phins this year (because we’re not going to get a fair trade value) and we’re 8-8 or better…..does he realize we could make a playoff run and decide to stick around another year?
mophins
by mophins on
Jun 11, 2008 3:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe JT will fall short of the HoF because...
...he is primarily a sack specialist. In the NFL, sack specialists are like Closers in MLB in the ‘70’s. Sack numbers being put up now will become more common in the coming years. Chris Doleman and Kevin Greene haven’t made the HoF in their first 3 years of eligibility, and they have 33 and 43 more sacks than JT. They have more sacks than Michael Strahan. How can JT make the HoF with clearly inferior stats to these guys?
I believe that JT needs at least 3 more years of high level productivity to put himself into the sure fire HoF category. Even then, if Doleman, Greene, and Strahan have not made the HoF by then, he’ll be competing with them for votes.
by dab415217 on
Jun 11, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
But he does more than sack.
How about his 41 forced fumbles and 8 touchdowns? That’s impressive, isn’t it?
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 5:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Matty, here's the real question.........
How differently would the responses to this post be if JT was in camp raving about not being able to wait to win a SB with the Phins in 2-3 years? And he thinks of Parcells as a 2nd Dad?
mophins
by mophins on
Jun 11, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
1 recs
I think the biggest question is the rest of his class..
Since I’m fairly certain JT will play this season and THEN retire, he won’t be going in with Strahan, Favre, Ogden, and maybe Larry Allen and Warren Sapp, , so who will he be going in with? If no other high-profile players or HOF locks retire next season, JT will be the biggest first-time name on the ballot, correct? I think Strahan, Favre, and Ogden are guaranteed, Sapp and Allen may have to wait, so does JT get in with them two?
Other possible guys who will probably go in first ballot and may retire after this season… Orlando Pace, Tony Gonzalez, Zach Thomas(??). Is JT in with those guys? I would say Yes.
http://miamiheattimes.blogspot.com/ A blog dedicated to the 2006 NBA Champs, The Miami Heat
by Little Nicky 21 on
Jun 11, 2008 6:05 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You open up a whole new debate...
...with Zach Thomas. Should he get in? I think so. But I don’t think people outside of Miami feel that way.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 8:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
By the numbers...
Let’s compare just by numbers to some of this eras best…
Games / Tackles / TPG / Sacks / FF / INT / TD / Pro Bowls
Zach Thomas 168 / 1642 / 9.8 / 19.5 / 15 / 17 / 4 / 7
Ray Lewis 162 / 1520 / 9.4 / 30 / 10 / 25 / 2 / 8
Brian Urlacher 121 / 970 / 8 / 37.5 / 8 / 15 / 1 / 6
Derrick Brooks 208 / 1646 / 7.8 / 13.5 / 24 / 24 / 6 / 10
compares pretty well to Lewis. Ray has the edge in sacks and INT’s, but Zach has more tackles.
Urlacher has played far less games, but his tackling numbers suggest he won’t catch Zach if they play the same amount of games.
Brooks has 40 more games, but only 4 more tackles, but he dominates as far as causing turnovers.
Overall, I would say if those other are in, Zach is as well. It’s open to debate, but I figured I would bring some statistics to the argument.
(and sorry about the format its the best I could figure out, anybody who knows to fix it please do)
http://miamiheattimes.blogspot.com/ A blog dedicated to the 2006 NBA Champs, The Miami Heat
by Little Nicky 21 on
Jun 11, 2008 9:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good stuff
I recently did a little debate about Ray Lewis and Zach Thomas on another site and did the exact same thing comparing the numbers. I think Thomas gets overlooked too much by the national media, which worries me when Hall voting time comes around for him.
by Matty I on
Jun 11, 2008 11:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














