New Draft (Value) Chart
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/15/new-draft-trade-chart/
PFT:
A couple of weeks ago, we developed a revised trade chart for valuing draft picks. We've since caught wind of a new chart that has been developed by and among multiple teams, and that could be put in use as soon as this year.
The new chart can be seen right here.
In contrast to the current trade chart, the new chart has very different values for the picks in round one. At the top, the points are compressed. The first pick was worth 3,000; it's now down to 2,000. However, the sixth pick is worth more under the new chart than it was under the prior version. Each remaining pick, from No. 7 to No. 32, is worth more as well, with the last pick in the round now worth 670, up from 590.
The only difference in round two is that the first pick in the round is worth 570 under the new chart. It previously had a value of 580. The values for all picks in rounds three through seven are unchanged.
The chart has been revised due to the dramatic increases in the contracts paid to the first few players selected in the draft. The financial investment required when exercising such a high pick necessarily has reduced the total value of these picks, necessitating a reduction in the total perceived trade value of the top selections.
The apparent reason for the 100-point gap between the bottom of round one and the top of round two is that the last player drafted in round one can be signed to a five-year deal. At the top of round two, the maximum duration is four years.
Under that theory, however, the difference between picks No. 16 and No. 17 should be more than 40 points, since the maximum contract length at the top half of round one is six years.
It remains to be seen whether the new chart becomes widely used by NFL teams. It's clearly an improvement, however, over the outdated chart that was developed in the 1990s.
This fanpost was written by one of The Phinsider's registered users.
0 recs |
12
comments
Comments
thanks Neo!
by LeftCoastFinFan on Apr 15, 2008 3:16 PM EDT 0 recs
back when you and i were arguing about
while a straight across trade for dallas' two #1s is not exactly even, it is now, according to this new chart, pretty doggone close.
:)
by LeftCoastFinFan on Apr 15, 2008 3:25 PM EDT 0 recs
Here's the value for us in such a trade...
by Natalya on
Apr 15, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs
yes ma'am!
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Apr 15, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah I know you've been
Then again, almost everyone complains about the money this #1 pick is going to cost us.
So here it is, you don't want to pay $30M+ in guaranteed money to a rookie? Trade down.
Brady Quinn went at #22 last year and got a great deal (for him) from the Browns. And yet, it only has a mere $7.5M guaranteed over 5 years. Between such a deal and the #28 pick, you are looking at maybe $11-13M guaranteed tops.
by Natalya on
Apr 15, 2008 4:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs
well, like you have said many a time
I just don't think he needs to trade up to #1.
:(
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Apr 15, 2008 4:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
why trade up to #1
by W NY Fins Fan on
Apr 15, 2008 8:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Exactly.
by ratenxs on
Apr 16, 2008 1:06 AM EDT
up
0 recs
BTW, you wouldn't happen to be in Vegas
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Apr 15, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
heh....nope
by Natalya on
Apr 15, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
no such thing
by LeftCoastFinFan on
Apr 15, 2008 4:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs













