Offensive Improvements
I think something that's been a bit overlooked this year because of the defensive struggles is the fact that the offense is improved. Some nay-sayers will claim that the stats are deceiving because the most yards are coming during "garbage time" with the game already out of reach. I'd argue that by saying that it isn't like the opposition is taking their best players out of the game or something. Are they playing a bit looser? Maybe. No one can say for sure. To me, though, the stats through 8 games do mean something. So let's start out by showing the typical NFL offensive stats for the Dolphins over the past 4 years:
| Year | Yds/gm | Pts/gm | Yds/play | 1st/gm | 3rd % |
| 2004 | 275.2 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 16.7 | 34% |
| 2005 | 324.9 | 19.9 | 5.1 | 17.1 | 35% |
| 2006 | 310.0 | 16.2 | 4.8 | 17.6 | 38% |
| 2007 | 322.1 | 20.8 | 5.3 | 20.4 | 40% |
As you can see, there is marked improvements across the board. The one anomaly here is the 2005 yards per game, which is 2.8 yards better than 2007. But despite that fact, the offense is still more efficient this year than in '05, as proven by the higher points per game, yards per play, 1st downs per game, and better 3rd down conversion percentage. That 2005 offense just had a couple more big plays courtesy of Chris Chambers.
The last two stats in the table are the ones I'm most impressed by. Picking up nearly 3 more first downs per game is a great improvement. As is the higher conversion rate on 3rd down. This shows that the team has improved in its ability to maintain drives more consistently than in the past. Let's hope for that to improve as the season goes along, though the absence of Ronnie Brown will surely hinder their performance.
Next, let's look at some offensive stats that fans don't generally use to analyze offensive efficiency. These stats are actually very telling stats when you look to compare offenses around the league:
| Year | Yds/drive | Pts/drive | TD/drive | TO/drive |
| 2005 | 25.69 (20) | 1.55 (17) | .168 (17) | .147 (21) |
| 2006 | 26.48 (22) | 1.29 (28) | .124 (29) | .130 (12) |
| 2007 | 30.68 (12) | 1.95 (9) | .210 (9) | .198 (28) |
As you can see here, this offense is surprisingly effective. They are gaining a whole 4 yards more per drive and have moved into the top 10 in the entire NFL in touchdowns per drive. However, you can see the big glaring problem and that is the turnovers. The turnovers are killing this offense. Few turnovers would have certainly resulted in more points generated by this offense. When you think about it, you can put a lot of blame on Cleo Lemon and Trent Green for the turnovers, meaning even a stronger case can be made to start John Beck. Perhaps Beck will take care of the ball better. If nothing else, the turnover problem couldn't get much worse, considering only 4 teams have a worse ratio than the Dolphins in that category.
The other case that can be made is that this defense is really killing us; even moreso than we originally thought. If they were able to hold on 3rd down more often and get this offense more possessions per game, than it would be fair to say that more points could have been scored. Think about this: the 2005 team totaled more yards per game despite averaging 5 yards fewer per drive. So it's safe to assume that the '05 offense was getting anywhere between 1 and 3 more possessions per game than the '07 offense is getting, and that is absolutely killing this team.
As with any statistics, take these numbers with a grain of salt. Numbers can indeed lie. But the one thing I hope we can all agree on is that this offense, for whatever reason (I know some don't want to give Cam credit), is certainly improved and is really the best offense this team has had since the 2002 season.
Thoughts?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
offense improvements
I'm not scared to say...
If we close our eyes...
The real gist of this is simple...is the offense better?
The dolphins games largely break down into 2 categories, 5 complete blowouts and 3 games where they were in it to the very end.
In the games they had a chance to win (houston, washington, giants), they put up no more than 19 points.
It is only in the games they've been blown out, that the fins have scored more than 19 points. Just look....
21 points against the pats in garbage time(it was 42-7 at the half)
A late touchdown against the Cowboys (after being down 30-13 in the 4th quarter)
14 points in garbage time against the jets (after being down 31-13 with just 9 minutes left)
A last minute touchdown against the browns to make it look close (the phins were down 41-24 with just 2 minutes left)
This is all happening, in my view, because the dolphins are no longer in games nearly as long as in years past. Teams can now play soft in the 2nd half against us because they are up by so many
points (example, NE was up 42-7 at the half).
On the flip side, every time they've had a chance to win, those 3 games (houston, washington, giants), they couldn't score enough - when your defense gives up 13, 16, 22 points, you should generally have a good chance to win.
Unfortunately....
Plus, the ONLY game we were really blown out of was the Pats game.
Cowboys game was 20-13 at the end of 3.
JETS game was 24-13 at the end of 3.
Raiders game was 21-17 at the end of 3.
Browns game was 27-24 at the end of 3.
Hardly games that were decided at that time and not games you would see teams playing us "soft" in entering the 4th QTR.
In terms of the 3 games you point out above..
WASH - We kick a game tying FG with less than 2 minutes in the game and then the defense gets RUN OVER in OT. (Offense never sees the ball)
Houston - We only scored 19, correct but were winning that game in the 4th QTR even though we didn't score much. Where was the defense on that last drive?
Giants - Agree, no argument. Had we not fumbled on the 2 yard line and fumbled at the end of the 1st half to give the GIANTS a FG, might have been in a better position to win it.
I love how you say...
The thing in question here is not "which is better, the dolphins defense or offense". The question remains, 'is this offense better than past offenses the dolphins have had'.
So let's go through what you've proported...
The dallas game, you show it as 20-13. However, you neglect to mention that with just 4 minutes left in the 4th quarter, the 'boys were up 30-13. You bet a team plays softer on defense with a 17 point lead and just 4 minutes to play.
The raiders game. Forget the defense, why couldn't the offense score when the game was 21-17? If we are going to talk about having a better offense then I have a hard time thinking 17 points constitutes a better unit.
The jets game you show as 24-13 at the end of 3. Yet the jets had a 31-13 lead with just 9 minutes left to play. The last miami TD, that made it 31-28 came with less than 2 minutes to play. Can you say garbage time?
Then the browns game, which makes me wonder what were you watching? That was a blowout@! It was 41-24 with < 2 minutes to play. Miami scores a TD to make it 41-31 with 1:30 to play. C'mon, yet more garbage time.
As for the other games, like washington, houston, and the giants - why couldn't the offense actually convert some red zone opportunities to touchdowns rather than field goals? Good offenses get 7, not 3. Good offenses can put up more than 13, 19, and 10 points.
So forget the defense and look at the offense - what you have is a unit getting lots of yards and points when the game was already decided and is really no better than last year.
Uh
But, not that Nat needs it, I will explain Nat's theory. Your arguments are good, if we only played 3 Qtrs, unfortunately we play 4 and the Fins have shown us we could get blown out in 2.
I will address your 4 games that you pointed out.
Cowboys game was 20-13 at the end of 3.
A whopping 20 total points while getting whipped 37-20. Awesomely we did get that last TD when the boys were comfortbly ahead 30-13 with 3:26 left in the game.
JETS game was 24-13 at the end of 3.
Very true it was 24-13 at the end of the 3rd, but what you failed to mention that the Jets score another TD just 2 minutes into the 4th to go up 31-13. To which (with the game out of hand) Miami scored 2 more TDs, 1 at the 9 min mark and another with 1 minute to go in the game to make it close.
Raiders game was 21-17 at the end of 3.
I won't argue much with you on this. We didn't score anymore and the final score was 35 -17, at home, to the team that had the 1st pick in the draft, enough said.
Browns game was 27-24 at the end of 3.
Yup, your right, we weren't gettin blown at at the end of the 3rd, because it was over at HALFTIME 27-10. In which Miami scored 2 TDs in the 3rd to get in close at 27-24. To which the Browns promptly shut down Miami's Offense again until they scored the 2 TDs back and went up 41-24 and allowed miami to make it look good and score another meaningless TD with about a 1:34 to go in the game.
So there you have it. In just 3 games there are 42 meaningless points/drives/stats that prove nothin. Tack on another 28 points/drives/stats in the NE game and you'll really see what we are saying.
by Neo on Nov 2, 2007 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Neo/Nat = Same person...
Just laughing at your logic. Lets go back to week 7, shall we?
Lets use your wonderful logic here...
Tennessee 32 Houston 7 -- End of 3rd Qtr.
Garbage time, send in the subs. Anything Houston does is ridiculous and shouldn't even count in the stats because it is meaningless. Wait, Houston scores 29 pts in the 4th Qtr and takes a lead in the game with Tennessee who is forced to kick a FG as time expired to win the game 38-36.. Garbage time, offensive stats shouldn't count, etc. etc.
So... Didn't Miami essentially not give up and do the same thing against the JETS? (Except they didn't recover the onside kick at the end of the game.) But fall 3 pts short? Is this garbage time stats because they didn't tie the game with 1 minute left? Tell that to the players on the field for both teams moron..
Same thing with Cleveland... Not even sure why the team came out in the 2nd half to play.
Problem is - in the Cleveland game, the offense got the team back in the game and the defense continued to let the Browns do whatever the hell they wanted on Offense. I didn't see Cleveland pull all their starters or back off on their defense at all.
But, according to you the game was over and there was no sense playing the remainder of those games. Certainly the stats shouldn't have counted.
Don't
Whatever point you may or may not have, looks completely invalid when you resort to ad hominem.
Nat let it go.
To this guy the players play and the coaches coach. So the coaches just stand there and watch the players play and when they get a big enough lead they put in the subs, ya know like basketball.
According to this guy opposing defenses don't go into prevent mode at the end of 1st halfs and games, because the starters are in. So there is absoutely no chanse their defense could be playing a little soft cause they don't wanna give up a possible big play and a quick score.
Give me a break. Any person that knows anything about football may not agree with us, but could certainly see what we are trying to say.
Ah jah!!
Bah, not 50 ...42 -)
by Neo on Nov 3, 2007 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't even...
On the other hand, a much more realistic poll is here:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/sportsnation/coach?coachId=60
Now you can see what most people think of Cameron (ie...not very good!), about 20-25% approval rating, and rightly so. Plus the espn poll has almost twice as many people having voted as the poll on this page so i think it is much more accurate, not to mention objective.
Oh for just one win....soon, soon....
Turnovers from the QB position are Fiedler-esque intolerable. You can almost smell the turnover coming before the snap.
Still, the offense is on the upgrade, which is good - in fact - one of our biggest strengths this season is the offensive line, thought to be a huge weakness leading into the season.
We need Offensive depth and defense help in the off season - maybe then we can be one of those turn-around teams.
So I see lights over there on the horizon, but as you say, it's time for Beck to show what he can do.

by 

















